Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5475
Next month in: 00:32:52
Server time: 03:27:07, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): caesar8293_ | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2168

Details

Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Strength Initiative

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2169

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:34:33, January 09, 2006 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageVCK,

Respecting your position as largest party and your attempt at bringing together the two sides, I offer you a substantial amount of responsibility in the cabinet.

I want you to notice that the other cabinet bill offers three parties, that comprise a majority, a boost of power, and will be likely to pass.

I offered this one up, though, so you could guiltlessly accept full representation for the left, as I offer my word to kill the other cabinet proposal upon your acceptance. You will surely hear others calling for you to kill this, that I will stab you in the back, or that you are selling out the rest of the leftist parties, but I think this is in your best interest.

Date11:41:30, January 09, 2006 CET
FromChinkopodian Economic Democrats
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageWhy am I not included!? :P

Date12:37:15, January 09, 2006 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageI accept this proposal. The people of Darnussia have called for a substancial socialist presense, but not a socialist head of state. I hope that I may serve the people of Darnussia within my capacity as a socialist party, and maintain a balance in the executive representation of the legislature as elected by the people. I thank the Corporatist Assembly for displaying maturity and responsibility, and I wish them every success in representing the Darnussian nation both on the domestic and the international stage.

Date16:32:52, January 09, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageVCK votd NO

Date16:33:08, January 09, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageWhy am I not included

Date22:45:46, January 09, 2006 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageI am very pleased with your acceptance VCK, and I hope that this cabinet provides some stability.

I only included three parties, because the fewer parties, the more effective the cabinets are. Big tent cabinets just cause infighting. I have found VCK and LBSC to be responsible and easy to deal with, and that leads me to believe that the three of us can reach conclusion much quicker than a massive conglomerate of parties. My apologies to those who lost seats.

As for the SDP, you are not included because I don't trust you, you have taken unethical liberties with the administration of this government and I do not wish to give you power which you can further exploit. If you want to be represented by this cabinet, talk to VCK, you endorsed him and I assume that means you trust him to act in your interest.

Date22:48:28, January 09, 2006 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageDo you oppose this, LBSC?

If you do not believe that VCK should be a part of the cabinet, I respect that, but disagree. I have given my word to not support the other cabinet proposed, so the failure of this cabinet will retain the status quo.

Date00:48:17, January 10, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2168
MessageI am only voting in favor considering that the left would lose a lot of power.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 341

no
   

Total Seats: 181

abstain
 

Total Seats: 28


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction.

Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64