We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Act for the Furthering of Civil Rights within the Federation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Populara Kuniĝo por Paca Disvolviĝo
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3844
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning interracial sex.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is legal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government recognition of interracial marriages (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning interracial marriage or civil unions.
Current: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Proposed: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:21:39, May 09, 2015 CET | From | Zardio Konfedera Partio | To | Debating the Act for the Furthering of Civil Rights within the Federation |
| Message | Mr. Speaker In future we ask our colleagues from the DSP to allow more time for debate before pushing something for a vote. No in terms of the actual bill we wholeheartedly agree with Articles 1 & 2 to enshrine them in law and protect them. However we believe that Slander and Libel laws are necessary to protect people from lies that could otherwise destroy a person's reputation. Kyle Woodbury Congressional House Minority Leader |
| Date | 01:08:05, May 09, 2015 CET | From | Populara Kuniĝo por Paca Disvolviĝo | To | Debating the Act for the Furthering of Civil Rights within the Federation |
| Message | Mr. Woodbury Apologies. I am afraid I was desperate to solidify my party's policy and, in doing so, committed a "faux pas". I will be sure to allow for more debate time in regards to any future legislation the DSP proposes. Again, apologies for the breach of decency. Konstantina Thekla Ioannida Chairwomen of the Demokratia Socialisma Partio (Democratic Socialist Party) |
| Date | 07:54:09, May 09, 2015 CET | From | Zardio Federisma Partio | To | Debating the Act for the Furthering of Civil Rights within the Federation |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The ZFP opposes the changes to the libel and slander laws. Adam Welcar Congressional Leader |
| Date | 21:13:57, May 09, 2015 CET | From | Populara Kuniĝo por Paca Disvolviĝo | To | Debating the Act for the Furthering of Civil Rights within the Federation |
| Message | Most Honorable Representatives, My party holds a great reservation against libel and slander laws. A line must be drawn between honest vocal opposition, of which includes protest, and words of malicious intent. It is not our believe that a state court should have the power to do so. Konstantina Thekla Ioannida Chairwomen of the Demokratia Socialisma Partio |
| Date | 21:38:24, May 09, 2015 CET | From | Zardio Konfedera Partio | To | Debating the Act for the Furthering of Civil Rights within the Federation |
| Message | Mr. Speaker We agree with the DSP that a line must be drawn and it is with the Courts that these lines are drawn. One persons honest opposition could very well be another mans threat. At the very least there needs to be laws in place to protect a person against both even if we remove the ability to launch a lawsuit over it. Aleksander Spiros Member of Congressional Judicial Oversight Comittee |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 453 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 197 |
| Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
| Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek |