We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Overturn of the Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3852
Description[?]:
| http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=257919 As the "Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786" states, "Article 9 ~ This Act can be overturned by a 2/3rds majority of the Senate voting in the affirmative in a vote specifically designed to remove it." Therefore, we are indeed proposing to overturn this awful bill. It allows various powers to the executive department, and that implies centralized power. That is the most forceful attack on equality and freedom in Solentia. Conservative parties like the Lib Dems and the GMS should accept this because a centralized government leads to a planned economy. Liberal parties like the Greens and the Blocks should accept this because a powerful executive leads to exploitation of the weak and defenseless and inequality. If this passes with 2/3's, I would like to note that any future executive that uses the powers in the Clarification Act shall resign immediately. This is an outdated and unnecessary legislative piece that shall be eliminated as soon as possible. This requires 284 votes for a 2/3's majority. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:42:08, May 26, 2015 CET | From |  Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Overturn of the Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786 |
| Message | "And who would make them resign? Your team of utterly illiterate paedophilia has just banned the police." Cecylia Goldsea-Vincenti, Unionist Leader |
| Date | 13:02:44, May 26, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Overturn of the Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786 |
| Message | If you use powers that aren't allocated to you, you are misusing your power. Politicians are the only people who need more restrictions. |
| Date | 14:14:40, May 26, 2015 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Overturn of the Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786 |
| Message | "Except the powesa were allocated to me; and by formally repealing the law you are all recognising it's validity. I thank you for that change of view, I am pleased that you have become more well read in the laws of the land. However you have not answered my question- who would enforce this law without a police force?" Cecylia Goldsea-Vincenti, Unionist Leader |
| Date | 17:51:08, May 26, 2015 CET | From | SUN | To | Debating the Overturn of the Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786 |
| Message | When we impeached a President for unlawfully using the powers contained in this act, the APS sat aside and did nothing. This has more to do with an ongoing feud APS seems to have with certain political parties. |
| Date | 17:52:43, May 26, 2015 CET | From | SUN | To | Debating the Overturn of the Supreme Presidential Power Clarification Act 2786 |
| Message | We would also like to underline that the SPPCA was overturned many years ago and attempts like this only give fuel to the Unionist's bizarre claim that this law is still in existence. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 309 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 31 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 85 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "Under every stone lurks a politician." Aristophanes (450 BC - 388 BC), Thesmophoriazusae, 410 B.C |