We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forestry agencies bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: People Socialist Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3859
Description[?]:
As much as we want to protect our environment, we also feel that more power should be granted to local governments concerning this issue. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:45:34, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the Forestry agencies bill |
Message | To the PSU, We don't understand this bill. Under current Rutanian law, Local government ALREADY regulate forestry agencies. This bill will allow Provincial governments to violate the private property rights of landowners. It is a vote against FREEDOM and LIBERTY!!! --The CWFP |
Date | 19:35:41, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Friends of Nature | To | Debating the Forestry agencies bill |
Message | Mr. Speaker The earth should belong to anyone, the land should belong the government and should never be privatised, so that the animals, may protected from the humans who wish to remove them from their land. There is no freedom and liberty, only exploitation. Audrey-Sophie Black-White |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 38 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 439 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 78 |
Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
Random quote: "If it were proved to me that in making war, my ideal had a chance of being realized, I would still say 'No' to war, for one does not create human society on mounds of corpses." - Louis Lecoin |