Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 02:34:59
Server time: 09:25:00, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Socialization

Details

Submitted by[?]: Front of the People of Beluzia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3875

Description[?]:

To implement a socialist republic in Beluzia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:01:00, July 11, 2015 CET
FromFront of the People of Beluzia
ToDebating the Socialization
MessageWe believe that after the refusal of the stantons to allow peace, we are in appropriate position to demand this. Long live Beluzia!
-Edward Thorne

OCC:If anybody in the left believes i missed something, please feel free to suggest another bill containing them :)

Date16:02:57, July 11, 2015 CET
FromFront of the People of Beluzia
ToDebating the Socialization
MessageThis bill suggests we follow the Executive Reform bill proposed by the Beluz Democratic Karavist Party.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=441665

Date17:23:43, July 11, 2015 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Socialization
MessageThe adjective is Beluz, the noun is Beluzian, therefore we cannot support the title "Chairman of the Beluzian People" - it should be "Chairman of the Beluz People."

Also, this bill does not suggest we follow the executive reform bill proposed by the BDKP. The bill proposed by the BDKP says that we should have a President, not a "Protector of Socialist Democracy" as the head of government. A "Protector of Socialist Democracy" is more appropriate for the head of state.

We wish that the FPB had waited for discussion before setting this bill to vote. We do, however, commend them for their efforts in pushing for reform.

--

Connor Ellery,
Secretary-General of the BDKP

Date18:17:35, July 11, 2015 CET
FromNational Liberal Party
ToDebating the Socialization
MessageWe believe that this shows that this will give more power to the people.

Date21:50:53, July 11, 2015 CET
FromKnights of the People
ToDebating the Socialization
MessageNo, for 3 reasons :

A. This bill doesn't show explicit name change
B. "Chairman of the BELUZIAN People" is just horrible
C. Social Republic should not be the name for a subnational entity


Date20:28:18, July 12, 2015 CET
FromFront of the People of Beluzia
ToDebating the Socialization
MessageI can't support this anymore due to the relized mistakes. (OOC It did go with the exectutive reform in fliping the roles, but not using the proposed names, I agreed with making our country unique, but I thought that the proposals were turning us from a bland republic to a bland socialist republic.)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 40

no
    

Total Seats: 271

abstain
   

Total Seats: 93


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69