We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Food Licensure
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Beluzians
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2172
Description[?]:
See below. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Licensing of food sales.
Old value:: Anyone may sell food, but shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Current: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only, and shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Proposed: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:33:55, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | Once again, I didn't know that the "Right" was in support of socialism. |
Date | 18:10:32, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | How does food licensure support socialism? |
Date | 01:04:27, January 15, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | You don't see how the government needlessly stepping in an attempting to control a private industry is an instance of socialism? What would you call it? |
Date | 04:19:21, January 15, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | I must have a different idea of what constitutes socialism. |
Date | 12:45:41, January 15, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | Why make it harder for the People to sell food? We already regulate its content and date, keeping chemicals and poisions out... Why choke small business in favor of corrupt GOVT. monopolies??? |
Date | 08:20:22, January 16, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | The small businesses can get a license..... |
Date | 11:01:48, January 16, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | Why should they have to? |
Date | 18:24:02, January 16, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | To ensure that they follow the regulations that you listed in your original comment. |
Date | 11:19:50, January 17, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Food Licensure |
Message | Thats what investigators are for! Regulations alone don't ensure compliance! You need to provide incentives and punishments, and collect data to enforce them! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 8 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 92 | |||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
Random quote: "I have come to the conclusion that politics are too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle |