We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Incestuous acts regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democrats
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3929
Description[?]:
| We are a civilised country and should change this law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on incest.
Old value:: Incestuous acts are legal and incestuous marriages are legally recognised.
Current: Incestuous acts are illegal.
Proposed: Incestuous acts are illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:45:44, October 27, 2015 CET | From |  Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | "How dare you try and determine the lifestyle of the private individual you authoritarian statist!" |
| Date | 15:47:55, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | Dear ACS, I know you like paedophilia, bestiality, incestuous relations and so on but the people of Solentia are against that. |
| Date | 16:15:10, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | "You cannot have a free society if you do not legalize things that are controversial. How does it harm you if a brother and sister have sexual feelings for each other and want to obtain sexual pleasure? It is of no business of the state what two or three or however many people do in their bedroom. The state shouldn't even exist in the first place. The fact that some person can get the state to arrest someone for a behavior that is "immoral" is bull-crap. What if by my personal morals I claim that eating bread is immoral? Would that make it prosecutable by law? No. If their is consent, this should be legal for sure. We would even legalize without consent, as we don't want governmental interference!" |
| Date | 16:27:54, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | There is a huge difference between degenerated society and free society. |
| Date | 16:31:41, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | "We don't advocate a degenerated a society. We advocate a society where the government doesn't have moral standards for their citizens. We don't want government to exist!" |
| Date | 16:35:00, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | If you do not want the government to exit - why are you a POLITICAL PARTY in the GOVERNMENT? |
| Date | 16:35:39, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | What is more - You do suport degenerated socjety. |
| Date | 18:19:52, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | "If we were to support a degenerated society, it would mean we would have proposals forcing people to have sex with animals or their relatives. We just let the people choose what they want to do. We are the moderate and neutral position in this debate because we don't use force. Also, our position in the government is necessary because in order to defeat government, you must take it down from the inside. You cannot decapitate someone you aren't in contact with. You want us to try and decapitate the government from a location where we cannot reach it. We must go into government, touch and fondle it with our hands, and decapitate is in a peaceful way. Only then will the government die, and the stateless society can start." |
| Date | 18:19:52, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Incestuous acts regulation |
| Message | "If we were to support a degenerated society, it would mean we would have proposals forcing people to have sex with animals or their relatives. We just let the people choose what they want to do. We are the moderate and neutral position in this debate because we don't use force. Also, our position in the government is necessary because in order to defeat government, you must take it down from the inside. You cannot decapitate someone you aren't in contact with. You want us to try and decapitate the government from a location where we cannot reach it. We must go into government, touch and fondle it with our hands, and decapitate is in a peaceful way. Only then will the government die, and the stateless society can start." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 289 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 136 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "Communism needs democracy like the human body needs oxygen." - Leon Trotsky |