Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5481
Next month in: 01:35:37
Server time: 18:24:22, May 10, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): FireboyUK | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Better Aloria Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Reform Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2172

Description[?]:

For a better Aloria, ready for anything.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:10:12, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageA bit extreme but it will send a message to the pacifists...

Date16:11:13, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageTry to make 2 only in times of war. Article 1 is probably not needed. What about instead having nukes only if victory is not feasible by any other means?

Date16:13:22, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageSRP: see IRC

Date16:21:14, January 16, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageWhat message is this sending to the pacifists?

Date16:23:43, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageBetter, SRP.

AGSP, it sends a message that despite how hard you try, Aloria will still have an army. Power to the Alorians!

Date16:27:39, January 16, 2006 CET
From Social Reform Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageCleaned up a bit. Devolution and militarism for a better Aloria. Pretty simple.

Date16:35:20, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageFor Aloria!

Date16:38:45, January 16, 2006 CET
From Democratic Liberal Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageThis is terrible, is the SRP Liberal Democratic or not?

Date16:39:51, January 16, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageYou're a militarist, we're pacifist. You want to set up a military state, we want freedom and equality. Which one is the fascist? Go on. answer properly.

Date16:47:21, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageWe don't want to set up a military state. We want our options open to defend ourselves. We would never attack, only defend.

Date16:50:35, January 16, 2006 CET
From Social Reform Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
Message"This is terrible, is the SRP Liberal Democratic or not?"

Liberal democrats can believe in having an army, you know.

"You're a militarist, we're pacifist. You want to set up a military state, we want freedom and equality. Which one is the fascist? Go on. answer properly."

So, you want equality and freedom. We want to defend equality and freedom.

Date16:54:33, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageOh come on. First off, I don't think that those who want to restrict the companies and environment (green socialists) are defending the economic freedom or the freedom of those in the affected companies. Second off, we need some defense.

Date17:09:38, January 16, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageNot to this extent..

Date17:15:13, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageWhere's the line drawn, then? Each party has their own platform. Most want freedoms, just have a different definition of it.

Date18:33:00, January 16, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageYup..

Date21:43:05, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageExactly why there's different parties. Not everyone's alike. It's a representative republic. So if people feel that my party best matches them, they'll vote for me. If they feel that your party best matches them, they'll vote for you. That tends to be how things go.

Date23:59:38, January 16, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageAlright. We might win. We just need one more party. Come on, Drache!

Date01:30:34, January 17, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageA republic! Different parties! You should practice what you preach...

Date02:52:40, January 17, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageWell, I'm sorry that voting doesn't have 10 options...

Date04:21:22, January 17, 2006 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageWe find it disgusting that you would include a pro-military section in an otherwise halfway decent piece of legislation.

Date05:56:52, January 17, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageWell, if everyone else didn't kill debate, then perhaps there'd be debate and we'd all be happy. Generally debate is nowadays during vote or whoever's lucky enough to see the bill being made and suggest things.

Date06:04:49, January 17, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the A Better Aloria Act
MessageOh, loss by 10 seats. This will be reproposed if there's any seat gains. If not by SRP, by the ICP...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 290

no
      

Total Seats: 310

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats.

    Random quote: "In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead." - Morton C. Blackwell

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 103