Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:53:08
Server time: 15:06:51, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Separation of Church and State

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2174

Description[?]:

Until were a theocracy Big Govt. should have nothing to do w religious matters.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:14:56, January 20, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageMarriage isn't a "religious matter". It is a contract between two consenting adults, and for it to have legitamacy it must have the force of government backing it up. Upholding contractual agreements is a valid function of a proper government.

Date07:41:05, January 20, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageWho determines the legatimacy of people's relationships then? How will this affect health care, tax relief and so on?

Date11:58:04, January 20, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageIt will cut out the red tape and unneccesary govt. interferance. The govt.s job is not to enforce contracts, particularly not religious ones. I should think our Godless Randian friend here would agree...

Date02:52:38, January 21, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageActually, he stated in another bill's debate that the purpose of government is to ensure that contracts are followed.

Date13:03:38, January 21, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageThats nonsensical. What freedom is there in a contract? What if I selfishly deny the authority of either contracts or of govt?

Date02:37:56, January 22, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageThen you would be a anachistic an a nihilist.

Date02:39:59, January 22, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageAnd you still haven't answered what you think religion has to do with marriage? A person doesn't have to be religous or involve himself in religion in any way to get married.

Date02:45:20, January 22, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Separation of Church and State
MessageSure he does! Marraige is a religious custom!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 13

no
      

Total Seats: 87

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

    Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59