We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State housing reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Right
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3987
Description[?]:
| There is no reason for the state to be involved in housing other than for the poorest in our country. And that is why the moderate party makes the following proposal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: The state contracts with private companies to provide public housing.
Current: Housing policy is to be determined by local governments.
Proposed: All housing is private but rent is subsidised for low-income households.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:22:19, February 21, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Right | To | Debating the State housing reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker How can the liberal alliance say that they are for a free market when they vote no to this bill? This bill will make sure that the poorest in our society have a roof over their head while removing the burden of public housing from the state. I do not see a problem with this bill here! And I would like them to email why they do not support it? Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party |
| Date | 22:27:46, February 21, 2016 CET | From |  Centrist Alliance | To | Debating the State housing reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker, It seems silly to privatise to then provide that company with tax payers money. Margaret Rademacher Health Candidate |
| Date | 22:54:17, February 21, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Right | To | Debating the State housing reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker I'm not sure if Margaret is aware of this but the entire country is not poor. What this will do is help those in need. But not give unnecessary help to those who do not need it. Instead they can get a little extra money in the wallet when the tax is lowered. This will help those who need it the most... But not help those who do not need it. That is not silly... Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party |
| Date | 08:10:17, February 22, 2016 CET | From | Centrist Alliance | To | Debating the State housing reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I know not all the country is poor but not everyone who's not poor wants outrageous rents. How can you promise tax will be lowered when you hold 28 seats? That's just a silly promise. Margret Rademacher Health Candidate |
| Date | 09:45:19, February 22, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Right | To | Debating the State housing reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker Well I had this thought that you who sat down with a socialist government would have just one tiny bit of decency in you. Of course if this is passed then taxes would have to be lowered or else the state would just be stealing other people's money without doing anything with it. But maybe I was wrong? Maybe you don't have that decency in you that you want to help everyone? Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 55 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 445 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |