We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Beluzians
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2174
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:04:56, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals |
| Message | We must ensure that we protect all animal species from extinction. |
| Date | 03:56:29, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals |
| Message | Why? What purpose does "protecting" these animals serve? |
| Date | 08:16:01, January 21, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals |
| Message | It keeps us from coming next. It also keeps tourists coming to Beluzia to see our native and distinct wildlife. |
| Date | 12:43:52, January 21, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Protection of Endangered Animals |
| Message | I oppose, regulated hunting and farming by experts must be allowed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 51 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 49 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats." - Benjamin Franklin |