We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear power bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2182
Description[?]:
| Considering the risks involved in mantaining such stations when both in active usage and inactive usage we of the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party propose that no nuclear power plants be permitted within Beluzia in order to safe guard her citizenry. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Current: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Proposed: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:11:12, January 22, 2006 CET |
From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | ooc: Online in general pretty even I would think, here in particular, vastly more people with their reproductive organs on the outside as opposed to the inside. ;) |
| Date | 03:33:10, January 22, 2006 CET |
From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | Nuclear energy is the most efficent and clean source of energy known to man that is able to be used already on a large scale. |
| Date | 21:11:36, January 23, 2006 CET |
From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | Hmmm only five - I would say thats a bit odd. In my experience of the internet a large proportion of guys get a kick out of reversing their gender.
I will only vote on this bill if their is a commitment into the research of nuclear fusion and a serious effort to boost energy production by tidal power - by far the BEST form of renewable energy. |
| Date | 00:36:31, January 25, 2006 CET |
From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | If we used waves the environmentalist wackos would just say that we are disturbing the sea urchins or disrupting the mating rituals of jellyfish or something. To them EVERY animal has more value than ANY human. There goal that they leave unstated and often unacknowledged is NOT the preservation of some worthless animal or habitat, but the distruction of Man as such. |
| Date | 00:10:26, January 26, 2006 CET |
From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | environmentalist wackos must be seperated from those who just wish to not see the World wrecked. Tidal power is simply a very good source of energy that takes away demand from oil and the like. We can live without oil power stations - but living without plastics and paints is a bit more of a problem. |
| Date | 18:45:57, January 26, 2006 CET |
From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | And suck up all the heat from our planets core, leaving terra a lifeless frigid husk?!?
Aieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee |
| Date | 23:25:52, January 26, 2006 CET |
From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | Actually thats not a response. Please address my horrifying concerns regarding the environmental devestaton your proposal suggests. Do these "minimal impcts" include planetary implosion? I think they might!
Let the People be the Judge of your treason!!! |
| Date | 00:54:00, February 05, 2006 CET |
From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | "I will only vote on this bill if their is a commitment into the research of nuclear fusion and a serious effort to boost energy production by tidal power - by far the BEST form of renewable energy."
@PAL I do agree with you however that would likely be better in a bill addressing research, I think there is actually a potential proposal in the big list about it. |
| Date | 18:14:27, February 07, 2006 CET |
From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Nuclear power bill | | Message | I understand your position. We will support because it woud be pointless nit-picking to turn down this proposal on a bill that is not dependent on this ones outcome. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 74 |
| no | Total Seats: 26 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, 'Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'" - Martin Luther King Jr. |