We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Presidential Cabinets II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4046
Description[?]:
| The Neo-Democratic Party believes there should be a greater separation of powers between the legislature and the executive, to promote a system of checks and balances to ensure freedom and liberty for the people of the Federal Union of Gaduridos. This bill would only allow the President to propose his or her own cabinet, bringing us closer to a presidential form of government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:31:24, June 16, 2016 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Presidential Cabinets II |
| Message | We look forward to input from the other parties. |
| Date | 19:49:27, June 16, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Presidential Cabinets II |
| Message | Due to our current system of united government we would have to support |
| Date | 01:18:19, June 17, 2016 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Presidential Cabinets II |
| Message | The Neoconservative Party supports this reform. |
| Date | 01:48:00, June 17, 2016 CET | From | Green Moderates Party | To | Debating the Presidential Cabinets II |
| Message | Again, after researching the duties and active powers granted to the ministers, we support this. |
| Date | 07:32:33, June 17, 2016 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Presidential Cabinets II |
| Message | We will re-propose this after the elections in September, and we hope to see all parties vote the same way as they have here. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 750 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "If God made man they say Sam Colt made them equal." - Unknown |