We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Potential Treaty With Beiteynu
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4067
Description[?]:
| Preamble: Both parties interested in providing for their mutual security, and encouraging friendly and cordial relations between our two nations and peoples hereby sign this treaty to further safeguard these aims. Article I: Friendship Section 1. Both nations agree to exchange ambassadors and allow fully protected diplomatic posts in their respective capitals. Consulates maybe established at a later date upon further negotiations. Section 2. Citizens of both nations when traveling to the other shall not need a visa if they do not want to stay longer then 1 month or do not undertake work.Only a valid passport from either country. is needed. Section 2.1 The laws according to the NMC remain untouched. Former criminals and people with an ongoing charges and people with serious mental and physical illnesses are not included in visa-freedom and the free movement. Also excluded are people employed by one of the two states. Exluded are people without permission to enter or exit the respebective country. Section 2.2 Border controls are carried out in accordance to national law. Section 2.2 In case of unusual events such as catastrophes or the declaration of martial law the free movement and other sections of this treaty can be rewoked by national law. Section 3. Each government through the appropriate agencies shall encourage and work for mutual beneficial educational exchanges, cultural exchanges and other such exchanges to enhance the ties between our two peoples and nations. Article II: Co-Operation Section 1. Both countries shall work further between national law enforcement bodies to promote co-operation in this area. However the extradition of holder of the Beiteynuse citizenship to the Federal Union of Gaduridos is not possible. The Bank Secrecy Act remains intact and shall stand above this treaty. Section 2. Should either nation be hit by a catastrophic event the other shall offer and dispatch all needed and available assistance to the affected area in either nation and provide in co-operation with the proper authorities. Section 2.1 In case of war the resbective nation can provide with humanitarian aid and money. Section 3. Both nations agree to form a duty and tariff free, free trade zone between them and shall not engage in protectionist measures leveled against the other within the 10 years after ratification of the treaty. This shall not include for export to Beiteynu: military weapons and the banking business. Article III: Mutual Security Section 1. Both nations shall share intelligence work in case of a common threat to be defined by the governing bodies. Section 1.1 This shall only include dates of citizens of Beiteynu, as long as there is an arrest warrent valid for Beiteynu. This arrest warrent has to be issued by an court in Beiteynu. Article IV: Miscellaneous Section 1. Should disputes arise both nations pledge to solve them peacefully. Section 2. Should either nation withdraw from the treaty at least 2 months warning prior to it be voted upon in the national legislature is to be given and the withdrawing party shall pay all expenses related to displacement from agreements under this treaty. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:56:44, June 25, 2016 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Potential Treaty With Beiteynu |
| Message | After reaching out to the Foreign Minister of Beiteynu, we have received the following draft proposal of a potential treaty between our two countries. We want to make sure that any treaty we agree to has the votes necessary to pass Congress, so we ask that the other parties review this proposal and propose any additions or subtractions they see necessary. Juan Perez Minister of Foreign Affairs |
| Date | 09:20:42, June 26, 2016 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Potential Treaty With Beiteynu |
| Message | What is the Bank Secrecy Act? Additionally, can you further explain 1.1 of the Mutual Security Section? |
| Date | 16:37:09, June 26, 2016 CET | From | Green Moderates Party | To | Debating the Potential Treaty With Beiteynu |
| Message | We support this initiative. Explanation of the Bank Secrey Act is seconded. What are the reasonings behind physical illnesses and state employees being prohibited from free-movement without permission? Is there a theory that we can craft to have state-recognized disability cards and a tiered level of clearance for State employees? What is the reasoning behind extending exemptions for protectionist and competitive policies directed at the domestic weapons and banking sectors? By maintaining separate currencies, our two nations are free to influence their own exchange rate. If this sector is at liberty to antagonize a currency war by artificially adjusting or speculating in markets, a trade war and political conflict will ensue. And what is the reasoning behind permitting the weapons industry access, over foodstuffs or raw materials? Beiteynu is the only party to be required to keep thorough folios on their citizens? Sharing intelligence freely, at the discretion of the government, can encouragement transnational persecution of dissension. What is the reasoning for requiring them to perform any action of intelligence administration without mutually requiring it? |
| Date | 19:46:05, June 26, 2016 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Potential Treaty With Beiteynu |
| Message | We thank the NDP and GMP for offering some of their questions and concerns with the treaty offered to us by Beiteynu. We will answer each question after consulting with the Beiteynu Foreign Minister. |
| Date | 21:51:46, June 30, 2016 CET | From | Free democracy party | To | Debating the Potential Treaty With Beiteynu |
| Message | We see virtually no issues with this agreement, it seems fair and we would vote for this. However as leader of my party I believe that it shouldn't be up to us, in the capital to decide this. This is a momentous desicion and we believe that the public should decide. I formally ask the government to put this question to the people as this effects them more than us. If the government say no to our proposal, then we shall hold a referendum if we ever came to power. I hope the government and the president agree with us on this. We have only one issue with this treaty, article 5 section 2. Why should the politicians in the capital decide this? I agree that we should vote on it but if we where ever to want to stop this agreement shouldn't it be put to the people? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 296 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 104 |
| Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens." - John Maynard Keynes |