We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)
Status[?]: debate
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Description[?]:
| This bill serves as an ongoing discussion between the Government/Ruling Party or Parties and the Opposition Parties in Kalistani National Government. This Bill will not be Moved to a Vote, but will remain on the "Bills Under Discussion" Section of the National Page. It will also be added into the RP House Rules of Kalistan. District Government Question Time Forums, which operate on the same rules as National Assembly Question Time, are found at the following Links: Ananto- http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=477108 Neveras- http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=477112 Odufaray- http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=477110 Suldanor- http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=477111 Vrassa- http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=477109 National Assembly Question Time Guide 1. Any Party may demand an account of any policy or overall agenda from the Premier or any Minister of the Government. Priority will be given to the questions from Opposition Parties. All Questions must be directed explicitly at the Officer intended to answer them. Parties may not directly engage one another in debate during Question Time: Questions are always from one Assembly Deputy to One Explicitly Declared Cabinet Member. 2. The Premier may designate a member of his or her own Party to speak on his or her behalf in answering the Questions. 3. The Premier or Minister should make it a priority to answer the questions put to him or her in a timely manner. 4. Ministers may opt to answer if the question specifically touches their portfolio. For example: if a Question deals with foreign affairs, the Foreign Minister may opt to answer or to amend or aggrandize the Premier's answer. 5. Members of the Premier's Party may also ask Questions of the Premier or any of the Ministers. 6. Any Questions dealing specifically with District Matters should be referred to the District Government Question Time Forums. 7. Any questions to be directed at the President of the Republic should be asked on the Nation's Page. Question Time is exclusively for Members of the Assembly to Question the Government of the Republic. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:34:33, July 07, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | We will leave Question Time open indefinitely. |
| Date | 03:15:17, July 08, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Parties may begin at any time questioning the Premier or the Government, as they please. This bill will never be moved to a vote, so it is open for use. |
| Date | 00:53:02, July 09, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Premier, What is the immediate agenda of your government and how will you work with other parties to ensure that you can get this agenda through the National Assembly? Thank you. |
| Date | 01:11:49, July 09, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Comrade Speaker from the People's Movement, Thank you for your Question. My agenda is to work with the President of the Republic and the Leaders of the incoming Governing Parties to transition the government. This is the only point on our Agenda. The second part of the Question will be answered by those whose aim is to comprise the new Government. |
| Date | 01:17:51, July 09, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Premier, Thank you for your timely response, a follow up question if I may. Will the governing party set a deadline for when a new cabinet will be in place? |
| Date | 01:26:32, July 09, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Comrade Speaker, We have asked the AKIP to present The President with a government slate which is acceptable to the Majority. The President has informed my office that as soon as the President receives the slate, he will send it to me and I am to forward it to the Assembly.. I have informed the President that I will comply with Prerogative, but not before the President promised to also propose a face-saving alternative government bill which includes the SP and the KLP, who would likely do a lot better in a two Party coalition than they would in a three Party coalition. When the AKIP presents the President with the Slate, we will move it immediately forward here in the Assembly. |
| Date | 01:27:23, July 09, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | As a follow up- I would personally like to see the bill advanced within the next 2 months. |
| Date | 01:33:51, July 09, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Premier, Once again, I thank you for your timely response. |
| Date | 11:48:12, July 10, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr premier, Many of my constituents in Kaliburg have expressed concern over ODEN, they want ODEN out of Ananto. Will the Premier listen to their concerns? |
| Date | 17:53:52, July 10, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Speaker from the AKIP, Thank you for raising this issue, it is one which has provoked debate and controversy across Kalistan. I think I speak on behalf of both my own party and my coalition partners when I say that unilateral withdrawal from the ODEN is neither achievable nor desirable. Whilst I appreciate the concerns of your constituents, there are many, many more supporters of the ODEN within the KFPM, the SPoK, the KLP and indeed within the AKIP. This is not, by any means, me suggesting that the organisation is without its flaws. I encourage my friends in the AKIP to direct their concerns and grievances to 'The New ODEN' [http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=477308] where this is being debated, though I must warn them that they are unlikely to support much of the discussion so far on the issue. |
| Date | 18:07:20, July 10, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Comrade Premier, We have noticed that we passed the government bill and the VERY NEXT PIECE OF LEGISLATION you put forward was a vote of No Confidence for the purposes of taking down the Government. We ask, after all the work we did to forge the new Government, was it always your intention to stab us in the teeth, or was there some other motive to the Premier's Actions with that bill that will just reset this entire business about Government Composition> |
| Date | 18:36:53, July 10, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Speaker from the Socialist Party, The call for early elections should not be seen as a vote of no confidence in this government, that would suggest I have no confidence in myself! In fact, the reasoning behind this is to strengthen the position of our two parties in order that our government may increase its majority. We hope you understand that this bill was to aid the coalition not damage it. |
| Date | 19:00:29, July 10, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Comrade Premier That will not likely happen. It will serve to weaken the SP and will not change much, relatively speaking for the FPM, except that Party's Likelihood of pushing through the constitutional reform bill which will allow the new Majority, (The AKIP and the KLP) to put themselves into office. The electoral positions are too close right now for the electorate to go really for the Governing Parties and not simply spread their votes evenly across the Parties. But we will still likely be the plurality Party, because our visibility is highest, just not strong enough to really matter. If your intention is to stabilize the government, we would ask why your Government would not allow us to work on constructive legislation which would improve our electoral positions in time for the next, regularly scheduled election? Under this scenario, the only thing that wins is the Constitutional Amendment, which I suppose the FPM still supports, but which the foes of other things on Kalistan's right will be champing at the bit to pass. I suppose it is up to the Premier, but if the bill for new elections passes, it will be seen as cutting the SP's throat. We do not have enough seats to oppose the election, and due to the similarity in voting records between all four Parties, we will likely have fewer seats after the next election. (OOC: The voters in Kalistan are not ideological. They do not have Party loyalty. their votes are decided by algorithm, and that is hard baked into the game...) We would therefore implore the Premier to oppose the New Elections. That's all. |
| Date | 19:06:36, July 10, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Speaker from the Socialist Party, Your ability to articulate the case of your party is admirable and serves your party well. For the reasons outlined above, we will concede to the SPoK on this issue and withdraw the early election bill however we should make it clear that we still believe the position of this government would have been strengthened. We hope this issue has not eroded too significantly the relationship between our two parties and we look forward to continued co-operation in government. |
| Date | 21:53:24, July 14, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | From the Speaker of the Socialist Party, Comrade Premier, congratulations on your return for a second term as Premier of Kalistan. Would the Prime Minister care to share his legislative agenda for the next three years with the body, so that the Cabinet may begin working up some bills in support of that agenda? Thank you and again, welcome back. |
| Date | 22:35:22, July 14, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Comrade Speaker, Firstly, I am honoured to be able to serve once again as Premier and I congratulate the rest of the cabinet on their return too. A special thanks goes to the outgoing Internal Affairs minister Gregory D'Bacchus and a warm welcome to the two new permanent members of the cabinet: Trade and Industry Minister Lorenzo Ambrose and Mr D'Bacchus' replacement Vitalico Viviani. I know both men well and am certain they will give their best for the Kalistani people. Finally, a special congratulations to the returning President. Now with the pleasantries out of the way, time to get down to business. In terms of my agenda, the highest priority going into this election was to do whatever I possibly could in order to ensure we could maintain stable governance in the immediate aftermath of the vote. Fortunately, the swift action of the President means that is of no concern anymore. Kalistan is experiencing exciting times politically and I wish to open the door to the non-Cabinet parties to reassure them that we will make sure we represent all Kalistani citizens not just those who voted for the governing parties. Domestically, I believe Kalistan continues to maintain economic and social prosperity but I will not allow this government to become complacent. Many parties have expressed beliefs that there are crises taking place in our nation and whilst this is not my own view, we must review our current legislation to ensure it is maximising the standard of living for Kalistanis. To this end, I recommend that the Finance Minister, Tina Orisay, conducts an analysis of the current tax plan and reports back if she feels that the nation is ready for a drop in tax or if an increase is required. Economics aside, my other focuses will be to expand the civil and religious liberties of our citizens yet ensure that we do not restrict their ability to comfortably avoid poverty. Furthermore, I wish to look again at our foreign policy to develop links with similar-minded, nearby allies so that Kalistan can return to the world stage as a voice for freedom, affluence and security for all people. I would like to build on the work done already in building bridges with our neighbours and also open ourselves up to new relationships elsewhere. The Labour Party was contacted prior to the election by the ruling party in [http://bit.ly/29FEN7r] and this presents an opportunity for the Foreign Affairs Minister to evaluate. Finally, I will help to ensure that the New ODEN passes through the assembly and promote similar reviews of other long-standing bills- for example the KALNAPECO, KALNAFERCO and the National Security Agency Charter. I hope this satisfies my Socialist friends. |
| Date | 07:55:14, July 15, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Statement from the Finance Minister: We will be recommending a new budget once our audit is complete. There are several items which dropped in terms of payments, as these levels were left over from the war footing, and can be reduced. A corresponding reduction in taxes may be in order, but we would recommend they come from the Corporate Side, rather than the income side. We will take a look at various formulas and present a plan to the Government within the next three Months. |
| Date | 07:59:00, July 15, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | From the Speaker of the SP: We would ask the Government to consider, rather than liberalization of the National Industries, a partial divestment. It is of course in our national interest that The Retain controlling interest in all these national industries, but we would be amenable to a stock sale to raise revenue, and the establishment of basic democratic governance of these institutions. The Stocks would be available to Kalistani investors first, and then to foreign investors, but the State would always maintain no less than 51% of the shares in all national interest. Right now, it is our understanding that the State has 100% of all these institutions, so I would suggest that new stock be offered in these already highly profitable companies. |
| Date | 19:55:23, July 15, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr premier, My party will be announcing a new bill describing devolution for regional governments. If the bill is passed will the premier write to me to confirm that the government would not seek to remove these powers from regional governments back to Kaliburg? Thank you. |
| Date | 21:59:39, July 15, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the CIP Speaker, My government will not support the bill you have proposed due to the lack of concrete suggestions it contains. The vague nature of the bill leads us to believe that we wouldn't be able to safeguard the powers that we believe should remain in this National Assembly and ensure the continued union between the fives districts of this great- and united- republic. As a result, we also can't guarantee we would not seek to repeal the bill as soon as we are in a position to do so- in the unlikely event passes. We thank the CIP for their question anyway. |
| Date | 12:13:37, July 21, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr premier, First of all I would like to congratulate you in your new job, I know we won't agree on most things but I hope we can work together wherever possible. But now, let me get to the question, several of my local farmers have complained to me that they cannot have their voice heard inside the NAA because larger farms have more say than little rural farms. What is the government doing to make sure that smaller farmers voices are being heard in the NAA? |
| Date | 23:47:03, July 23, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | We would like to point out that under the current law, farm land is nationalized, and so farming operations are managed by the NAA. Theoretically then, there are no large or small farmers, only one large farm. One remedy they currently do have under the NAA is to purchase shares in the NAA. The Republic will remain the majority share holder, but the NAA is run by a board of directors appointed by the shareholders. One thing the farmers who are writing to you can currently do under the law is to purchase shares in the NAA. Perhaps the CIP would care to offer a bill which would give farmers subsidies for the purpose of purchasing shares in the NAA. This would work like a tax rebate, and would allow farmers to share in the success of the NAA. They would then gain not only a stake in the operation and direction of the Association, but would also gain a voice in its governance. The Premier would endorse any bill along these lines, so long as it is structured in a way which would allow us to pay out of the current budget without increasing taxes, and so long as it does not alter the terms of the Charter. Would this be something the CIP would be willing to work on? |
| Date | 00:09:50, July 24, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | The President and the Labour Party support the initiative suggested. |
| Date | 17:47:38, August 14, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Greetings from the Labour Party, The Prime Minister of Kalistan would like to bring forth a question to the President of the Republic, despite this being a slightly unconventional proposal. Mr Luca Curti would like to ask- on behalf of his cabinet- how long they will be relied on to continue in their current roles? If it is the President's intention to propose a new cabinet soon, as his current proposals look set to be rejected, we would like to know when this can be expected. If it is not then the current government will prepare for another term in their respective ministries. I look forward to a swift response. |
| Date | 15:40:34, August 20, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | On behalf of the President, the Labour Party Speaker would like to invite Premier Carrangus-Howard to present her agenda for the present term? |
| Date | 16:49:21, August 20, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Thank you for the Question, Comrade Speaker. The Agenda of this Government during the next couple years will be to carry through modernization which we passed into law three years ago, and if the Revenue changes carry through, do so on a reduced budget. We also want to ensure passage of the Prison Abolition Act and then begin the process of rehabilitating our prison population. Finally, we look forward to reversing the slow drift to the right that this country has been experiencing. The reintroduction of profit into the media is particularly troubling, and signals the first give away to the private sector of one of the basic needs of the people- to not be sold garbage in exchange for important information. We hope that much of this agenda makes it to the floor but we will see. |
| Date | 22:36:48, August 24, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | On behalf of the Labour Party Foreign Affairs Department, I would like to ask the Foreign Affairs Minister how he has been building relationships with nations around Terra over the past three years? At a time when Kalistan is experiencing tricky relations with its neighbours, it is important to develop links elsewhere. Additionally, I would like to ask if the Foreign Affairs Minister would consider an infringement of his responsibilities if the Labour Party were to propose a bill aimed at encouraging links with other nations? |
| Date | 23:34:19, August 26, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Excuse me, I know I shouldn't interfere but the reason we are having a bad relationships with our neighbours I because we refuse to give criminals back for punishment. We shouldn't act so aggressively to a neighbour. I have no more to say on the matter. |
| Date | 23:43:08, August 26, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | The CIP, as ever, demonstrate a complete disregard for Kalistani law. We CANNOT extradite citizens! We have had to explain this dozens of times to Baltusian parties but we expect better from a Kalistani one. We implore the CIP, before you comment please understand what it is you're talking about. |
| Date | 00:40:43, August 27, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | We understand the law, we are here to change it. I shall be introducing a new bill. But this doesn't change what I said though, surely we should be increasing relations with the nations we have damaged! |
| Date | 00:51:24, August 27, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | A reminder: Parties may not directly engage one another in debate during Question Time: Questions are always from one Assembly Deputy to One Explicitly Declared Cabinet Member. |
| Date | 01:30:20, August 27, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | It is still not entirely clear whether Mr. Benn is a citizen. I would encourage the Interior Ministry to look into this question and report back before we make any assumptions about whether destruction of Kalistan's long held tradition of non-extradition will even address Mr. Benn's situation. |
| Date | 23:15:09, September 28, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | I would like to ask what the government is doing to combat the vile cancer that is the new army of Kalistan? And when do they expect the new army of Kalistan to be gone? |
| Date | 23:42:04, September 28, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Whilst this question is probably put to the Premier, the Defence Minister Ella Ferrero would like to note that her ministry is in the process of drawing up plans which would allow both the regular forces and the paramilitaries to target known what we liked to call 'False Army' locations. The details will be run by the Assembly after the next election. |
| Date | 00:29:50, September 30, 2016 CET | From | The Conservative Independence Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | I thank the speaker for his response. I hope he will join me on condemning the attacks. |
| Date | 18:54:27, October 22, 2016 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr premier regarding your recent bill that you wish kalistan to make a one party state. Dont you feel that this would ruin the peoples right to vote and chose? To try new ideas?. Every party has there own views and i want the people of kalistan to see that. To pick the party that sees there views. Because we know to well that not everybody here is a liberal. So please. we beg that you remove this bill. And let people chose who they want to run there country. Thank you for listening. |
| Date | 19:49:14, October 22, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | We do not feel that this will ruin the the people's right to "vote and choose" as you say. There is nothing in the bill which prevents segments of the society from organizing themselves into a caucus and representing themselves directly. The one thing it DOES do is squelches the largely facetious claims of new Parties who rise in Kalistan with the purpose of contesting for power in Kalistan, but "claim" to be representing the people of Kalistan, which they do not actually represent, or in fact really know anything about. When this bill passes, there will be nothing to prevent the New Liberal Party, which has appeared out of thin air, from becomming the Liberal caucus and contesting for power within Left Kalistan. This process at least makes our politics a little more honest. We invite the New Liberal Party to read the Welcome message: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=488899 to get the most preliminary handle on Kalistani politics (which I fear might be quite different than the NLP assumes) and then proceed to adjust accordingly. Thank you for your question, and encourage you to continue to represent your constituency in our Assembly. |
| Date | 19:53:39, October 22, 2016 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Thank you for answering. We apologize as we fear we really did not understand. Thank you for explaining it clearly. |
| Date | 20:05:52, October 22, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Its no problem. As a long time Party in Kalistan, the SP, now known temporarily as "Left Kalistan" in preparation for the passage of the One Party Bill, is a fount of knowledge about the politics of Kalistan. We will be happy to answer any questions you have with regard to the functioning of our political system as you work your way into the Assembly. |
| Date | 14:35:04, November 13, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Ms. A. Whittle, the Minister for Justice, You currently serve as Minister for Justice yet your party sought to impose its leader as 'Royal Monarch of Kalistan' for the rest of all time. What about that course of action, and what about the attempt to impose strict border controls in our free and open nation, do you consider to be 'justice'? -Sophia Conti, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 18:34:31, November 13, 2016 CET | From | Kalistan First | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Sophia, Your question is very funny, justice is making sure that criminals can't get in and making sure that the wrong people don't get to harm you.. if they do then trust me justice will be served. |
| Date | 18:43:37, November 13, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Minister Whittle, I would prefer you do not address me by my first name, that is reserved for Comrades, which we are certainly not. It disappoints me that a government Minister considers opposition scrutiny of her judgement as 'very funny'. You are supposed to be performing a serious role, though I must confess I feel you are letting Kalistani's across the country down. I am particularly bemused by the phrase 'wrong people'. What is 'wrong' about people from other nations, exactly? Almost every person in my cabinet has a parent or grandparent who is not from Kalistan and I'm sure the same is true of most of us. Kalistan is not only A nation of immigrants, it is THE nation of immigrants! Those born in Kalistan are just as likely to be criminals as those born elsewhere. Anyway, you have blatantly dodged the first part of my question. Is it 'justice' that Randall Ross should be Kalistan's Royal Monarch of Kalistan until the end of the universe or is it, as I see it, disgusting cronyism? -Sophia Conti, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 12:32:04, December 04, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Questions to the Premier and his government; Where will Kalistan procure its naval vessels if it withdraws from the Istalian deal? What will happen to the thousands of workers who will lose their jobs if we withdraw from the Organisation of Drug Exporting Nations? How will we cope, economically, when our economy is in tatters? Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 14:41:49, December 04, 2016 CET | From | Kalistan First | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | We won't. -RR |
| Date | 14:54:59, December 04, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Ross, you are not the Premier nor are you a member of his government. Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 22:16:56, December 06, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | The complete lack of a response from the government shows us everything we need to know about their economic plan! They have no idea what they're doing on the international stage and cannot be trusted to run the country. Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 00:05:03, December 15, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kalistan (CPK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, My Question is to the minister for Health and Social Services, Minister, I have now tried twice to push through a ban on recreational drugs. Will YOU update the house on your stance to on recreational drugs as should we give up our largest export for better health for our citizens. |
| Date | 22:01:30, December 16, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Member, I understand that this question was directed to the Health and Social Services Minister but given that you have received no response, I will provide you with an answer from my point of view in the meantime. As the Foreign Minister, much of my responsibility is pursuing Kalistan's interests abroad- economically as well as politically and militarily. When it comes to Kalistan's position in Terra, economically speaking, most would agree we are in a much stronger position now than we were perhaps a century ago. Now, the Organisation of Drug Exporting Nations is not the only factor to consider in this growth. We have seen periods of extended peacetime, we have relaxed some laws pertaining to corporations and we have signed treaties with other Terran nations. However, with all of that said, Kalistan would not be in the economic position it is today without the ODEN. If you doubt that fact, you are economically illiterate. We have essentially unrivalled dominance in a market which few other nations are willing to invest in. The safeguarding of our recreational drug laws, that is to say the fact that they will never change, means we are an unparalleled certainity in the market. There are legitimate health risks when using substances like heroin, cocaine or lysergic acid diethylamide but all of the evidence suggests that the worst way to combat these problems is a ban on them. Through the ODEN, users can be certain that the products are what they say they are, that they are not taking lethal doses, that the equipment they use is clean and above all else, they can get help. Put it this way, who is more likely to provide you with addiction support, the government or the back-alley dealer? It baffles me that in today's society there are people who want these substances banned, it flies in the face of all the research conducted in this field. Nonetheless, there are arguments from a civil liberties perspective and from the already-mentioned economic perspective on top of that. The revenue we pull in from the Organisation of Drug Exporting Nations is significantly higher than the expense of treating drug-related conditions. With all this in mind, I ask you to seriously reconsider your attempts to ban recreational drugs in Kalistan and I ask you to place the good of the country above your own personal conviction. I now invite the Health and Social Services Minister to answer your question, too. Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister |
| Date | 04:55:23, December 18, 2016 CET | From | Populist Environmental Party (PEP) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I would like to call on Minister Fabian to speak on his foreign policy agenda and give us an update on affairs around Terra. - Internal Affairs Minister, Michael Bergmann |
| Date | 11:44:27, December 18, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Minister Bergmann, As ever. my foreign policy cannot be entirely disclosed in such a public forum however I can give you an overview of the plan and how far along we are. Our relationship with our closest allies, in Istalia and in Trigunia, remain robust and extremely beneficial. The treaties we have signed with those two nations, despite the criticisms of certain other parties have had a significant impact on our ability to engage with them. Additionally, they have created a new stability about our relations- where previously governmental change could very much rock the boat. Elsewhere, we have continued good bonds with Hawu Mumenhes and Hutori. I have recently begun the drafting process on a treaty with Hawu, something which I believe most will agree is overdue. As I receive a response from my counterparts, I will continue to refine this deal and hopefully create an agreement which improves lives in both nations. With Hutori, there is the known space exploration project we are cooperating. In future, we are exploring future collaboration with a number of different nations. The visit of Zardic Foreign Minister is a signal of intent that we want to establish a stronger presence in Majatra and we are looking to use our bond with Hawu to connect with the other Esinsundu Empire nations: Talmoria and Cobura. As you know, I want us to connect closer with Sekowo through a Treaty of Co-operation and Friendship. I would like a similar deal with Dankuk, too. Lastly, I have made brief and initial contact with Baltusia and Aldegar to establish the positions of those regimes. Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister |
| Date | 20:40:19, December 18, 2016 CET | From | Populist Environmental Party (PEP) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Minister Fabian, Thank you for your time and your efforts in improving our relations. However, I must ask: What is the current situation with Saridan? - Minister of Internal Affairs, Michael Bergmann |
| Date | 22:09:26, December 18, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Bergmann, The previous sanctions against Saridan, on the grounds of them permitting slavery were lifted several years ago. In this sense, there is currently no notable relationship with Saridan- positive or negative. Nonetheless, they continue to be a nation which promotes abuses of human rights, the most recent example being the re-introduction of racial segregation. We are considering a reintroduction of a trade embargo. Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister |
| Date | 00:36:02, December 19, 2016 CET | From | Populist Environmental Party (PEP) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Minister Fabian, While your motives are admirable, I fear that re-implementing sanctions on Saridan would result in an uptick in violence and threats against our own country. We must keep in mind that our people could be put in danger by meddling with how another nation governs theirs. Perhaps we should move a sanctions bill to the 'debate' stage so that all parties can have a say on the matter. - Michael Bergmann, Internal Affairs Minister |
| Date | 00:41:04, December 19, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Bergmann, Your claims require substantiation before I will consider them valid in any way. There is no evidence whatsoever that sanctions would result in violence or threats, we had sanctions for an extended period and the only result was that Saridan banned slavery. It troubles me that you appear sympathetic to the most serial and prolific abuser of human rights on Terra, let alone Seleya. Furthermore, I find it to be absolutely disgraceful that you view 'our people' as more important than other human beings. You seriously believe we should allow segregation to make life a bit easier for our businessmen? That is disappointing to say the least... Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister |
| Date | 18:31:27, December 19, 2016 CET | From | Populist Environmental Party (PEP) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Minister Fabian, Of course segregation is a despicable act. However, I need proof that Saridan is actually practicing it. - Michael Bergmann, Minister of Internal Affairs |
| Date | 18:48:23, December 19, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Minister Bergmann, I find it very hard to sympathise with those who defend such disgusting nations as Saridan. You appear ignorant when you take such action. For the love of Eliyahu, stop pandering to these people! Return your focus to internal affairs and allow me to deal with Kalistan's international relations. Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister OOC: http://bit.ly/2hMhQ8j ; http://bit.ly/2h2UXPe |
| Date | 21:31:00, December 19, 2016 CET | From | Populist Environmental Party (PEP) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Minister Fabian, All I called for was a discussion on sanctions and you label me as ignorant? I also never said that I wouldn't support sanctions...because I would support them. With all do respect, Mr. Fabian, you're way too quick to pull the trigger. I approached Saridan numerous times to see if we could find middle-ground...and evidently we couldn't. However, when I spoke with them, the Saridanese government was adamant that the sanctions on slavery were still being upheld long after you had taken them down. I ask that you use diplomacy first with other nations before acting so quickly. Also, please don't leave us in the dark on these matters - Michael Bergmann, Internal Affairs Minister |
| Date | 21:47:24, December 19, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Minister Bergmann, The reason I called you ignorant is because you asked me for evidence of segregation in Saridan. Such evidence could've been easily found without using the official government scrutiny forum by simply consulting the legislative record of the Republic of Saridan- which is freely available. If you want a discussion on sanctions, propose one! The Question Time forum is not the place for it, though! I'm rather disappointed to hear that you have been approaching Saridan without so much as notifying me, that is clearly undermining my role as the Foreign Minister but even so, why are you looking for a middle ground? Between segregation and non-segregation, no middle ground exists and if it didn't I would not want to find it! The Saridani government can be adamant over what they like, the sanctions were lifted and this was made clear at the time. It is absolutely hypocritical for you to request I do not leave you in the dark when you are just now revealing that you have been in detailed correspondence with not one but TWO foreign governments without even letting me (the Foreign Minister!) know. How you can even suggest I have left you in the dark, when I have just outlined, in painstaking detail, my agenda in foreign policy is beyond me. Lastly, I wish to know why you believe I have not used diplomacy. As we speak, my office is liaising with Saridan, Telamon, Istalia and Vanuku to try to prevent a conflict in South-Western Seleya. Please, as I say, focus on your own damn job! Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister |
| Date | 07:20:38, December 20, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kalistan (CPK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I rise to the power of the call today to ask my question to the president. Will the president apologise for his message Saying "Fuck Off" when I was just trying to do some peaceful lobbying.mdoes he understand that when saying that he is saying fuck off to the 76 elected members from the Conservative Party and the 233 from the Radical Front. Does he understand that he is saying that to 23,068,791 Kalistan citizens who voted for the CPK and the KRF. He says he is a man of the people but he shows no respect. |
| Date | 10:27:50, December 20, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Honourable Deputy, Firstly, the President does not attend Question Time and if you were to read the rules you would know that questions to the President are not allowed here. Nonetheless, it was me who told you to fuck off so that is not really relevant. Let me make this absolutely clear and transparent so there can be no doubt about my position. I won't apologise to you for your pathetic attempt to crush our liberty and our economy simultaneously- you are a disgusting party for even trying to do that and you should be ashamed of showing your faces in this National Assembly. On the other hand, I very much doubt that all twenty million odd people voted for the CPK and KRF on this promise alone but if that is the case, and they all agree with you then they can fuck off as well. A point of note, too, you have falsely attributed a quote to me: 'he says he is a man of the people'. I have never said that and I never will because it isn't accurate. I am a man of the workers, a man of the left and a man of my constituents but I am not a man of the people. Hence, I am tucked away in the Foreign Ministry while Oscar Machado is campaigning! Jean-Baptiste Fabian, Foreign Affairs Minister |
| Date | 18:50:49, February 14, 2017 CET | From | Kalistan First | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | I have a question for the Minister of Justice, Why does the government continue to support a program that makes prisons non existent and how will the ministry punish complaints without prisons. -Distinguished Deputy for the KSM |
| Date | 19:32:52, February 14, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | My Honourable Colleague, We support the current justice system for two reasons. Firstly, it protects the rights of citizens against an oppressive police state, which we know the KSM/KRF wish to impose on Kalistan and secondly, we support it because we know it works. All citizens understand that cooperation and the collective good is driving force behind all actions and so any crime would be counter-productive. The Ministry of Justice will continue to punish crime in the way it has for decades- before you or I were born. Arianna Giannelli Minister of Justice Labour Party |
| Date | 03:48:50, February 15, 2017 CET | From | Kalistan First | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | To the Minister of Education, In History classes today are kids being taught about Randall Ross? And if not why? -Distinguished Deputy for the KSM |
| Date | 14:23:31, February 15, 2017 CET | From | Kalistan First | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | And also to the Minister of Trade and Industry, what are the benefits of moving Arta Cola to Kalistan? |
| Date | 16:19:47, February 15, 2017 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | -Tennyson Freal, Minister of Trade and Industry "Excuse me, to my colleague in the KSM, who or what is Arta Cola? Would you care to make some reference to negotiations of this government in regard to Arta Cola? During my participation in this government, I have not engaged in any discussions over any such thing. If it happened during the period of my Predecessor's tenure, I can't speak to that with any sort of confidence. But if you will refer me to discussions about Arta Cola, I will be happy to make a comment." |
| Date | 22:53:15, February 15, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | On behalf of the previous regime, I can confirm that there were no negotiations of any kind with the named company. The Ministry had no association whatsoever with that firm. Joost Kramer Former Trade and Industry Minister Labour Party |
| Date | 23:38:02, February 15, 2017 CET | From | Peoples Party | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | In History classes, students are taught about every founding member of our current parties. So, yes- we teach them about Mr. Ross. I hope this helps. Gregory Salaka Minister Education |
| Date | 21:24:22, January 25, 2018 CET | From | Kalistan National Front | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr Premier, First of all I would like to thank everyone for the opportunity to ask the first PQ in many decades. And second of all I would like to ask what is the government doing in response to the NUP’s return in another country? |
| Date | 17:47:16, January 26, 2018 CET | From | Kalistan National Front | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | We are monitoring the situation and will take appropriate action if necersarry. |
| Date | 18:23:00, January 26, 2018 CET | From | Progress Party—The Greens | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr. Premier, We would like to question why the government sees it necessary to withdraw from the Alboro Agreement and to push for foreign aid to be linked to trading rights for foreign countries. The Alboro Agreement allows flexibility in border control strength within the range the government is proposing and is an important part of opening up our country for business travel and tourism. Furthermore, tying foreign aid to trading rights is an exploitative practice reminiscent of imperialism. Limiting foreign aid to countries we are confident are capable of responsibly managing it is one thing, but forcing countries in desperate need of aid to grant us concessions seems like little more than a big, powerful nation bullying a smaller nation and playing political games with the lives of the people who live in those countries. — Martina Gonzalez, Leader of the Opposition |
| Date | 14:35:58, January 27, 2018 CET | From | Kalistan National Front | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | First of all I would like to remind the leader of the opposition we require a question and not a statement from the questioneer. But I shall try to answer in the best way possible. We are not isolating our country but protecting it. People can still visit our country, they can still come on holiday and people can still leave to. So I really do not see the problem, we want to withdraw from the agreement in question because it is dangerous to thw security of our borders and must be replaced. |
| Date | 14:38:20, January 27, 2018 CET | From | Kalistan National Front | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Second of all why can’t foreign aid work both ways? Why should we just send money and produce to foreign countries for free and get nothing back? It doesn’t make any sense. It can work, and should work both ways. My government is trying to create a country and a Terra that works for all and if that means enacting the steps we are taking then so be it. |
| Date | 14:38:57, January 27, 2018 CET | From | Kalistan National Front | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | -Sherlock Hogon, Premier. |
| Date | 15:56:22, July 30, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Alliance (NLA) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Madam Speaker, The National Assembly is in a crisis of sovereignty, and must re-assert itself. It is an absolute disgrace that militia action would be taken in a foreign country, in a war, without the National Assembly and the President clearing such action. My question to the Premier is this: Did he, in his view, show utter contempt for this Assembly in authorizing a party militia to undertake action in Statrica, and did he ever plan to mislead the Assembly if it had not come to light so clearly? |
| Date | 15:56:42, July 30, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Alliance (NLA) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | - Zandra Arnold, Leader of the Opposition |
| Date | 02:45:48, July 31, 2018 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | (OOC: Sorry about the delay. I intended to have this done last night, but went to sleep before I could) IC: Comrade Leader, I am acting Party Leader, Maria Reina-Rodriguez, and I was authorized to answer all questions on behalf of the Government. As you have probably heard, the Premier has been forced to step down. As this is a crisis of Confidence in the Government, I am authorized to consult with Comrade President Maslow about the likelihood of holding a snap election. If the Opposition agrees, we will call early elections. If the President prefers to continue with the current Government, we will simply ask the President to authorize yourself, Comrade Opposition Leader, to run a new Government bill, with the President's preferred composition. Comrade Opposition Leader, To answer your question, the Premier of the Country, in operation of the Militia, was exercising his own authority to do so. It is not a National Matter, as Party Militias are entirely under the control of the Party. The Premier, Comrade Opposition Leader, was careful to ensure that the Regular Forces of Kalistan, nor the Chain of Command was in any way involved or implicated in any decision making, for good or for ill. Comrade Opposition Leader, the word her was "plausible Deniability". Comrade Opposition Leader, there is Precedent for sending Militia overseas when participation by regular forces will not be appropriate. The Premier intended to address the imperialist thrust into Statrica, and do so without Kalistan itself being implicated. We shall see in the next election, whenever that is, whether the SP was justified by the electorate. But at any rate, the goal here was to prevent any nation on Terra from claiming that Kalistan had been involved in anyway in that war. The unfortunate death of the Kalistanis in Statrica was a distinct possibility, and all who volunteered for the mission knew it. We still don't know the circumstances surrounding the deaths of our former President and former Defense Minister, but I would suppose that those who held these offices for such a long time knew precisely what they were getting into. Comrade Opposition Leader, The steps we have taken to allow the Government to conduct a full inquiry into the matter is that the Foreign Minister has seized Comrade Al-Khali's passport, and the Minister of Justice has begun conducting grand jury hearings to see if any violation of Kalistani National Law occurred. We also would invite The President to consider convening the Constitutional Court to investigate the matter in a non-partisan matter, so that the people of Kalistan, especially those who now sow outrage at the Premier's actions, can have faith in the fairness of the system. We shall await word from the President on all these matters. in the meanwhile, I believe I have exhausted my time, and I yield the floor to the Speaker of the Assembly. -Maria Reina-Rodriguez Acting Speaker, Socialist Party of Kalistan |
| Date | 01:07:05, November 04, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kalistan (CPK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Thank you Mr Speaker, I rise to the call today to ask my question to the premier of the republic. In may this year, our nation of Kalistan voted in an election. The results showed that my party, the CPK was re-elected to the chamber after a period of being dissolved. The election showed the CPK returning with the highest amount of seats out of any party as well as a working majority to the three conservative parties. When will the Conservative party of Kalistan and Kalistan first be given a spot in the cabinet as they have more seats in this house then other members of parliament. If the premier is unable to provide cabinet positions will they support a bill which see's the ability to propose cabinet positions by any party? - Scott Morrisen, Lead of the Conservative Party of Kalistan. |
| Date | 05:06:52, November 04, 2018 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker: Point of Order. The Current Government represents a majority of the Seats in the Assembly. Granted, it is not cleaved along ideological lines, but nonetheless, we are not a a minority government. The Presidential Prerogative, a long standing tradition in Kalistan, gives the right to name a government to the President. The President of the Republic took the advice of the previous plurality and named a government which still represents a majority. They named, as in accord with the Principles of the Separation of Powers, the minority Party's leader to the Premiership. Yes: The current Premier under the Socialist President IS a Conservative. The President has expressed his desire to seek the input of those Parties who supported his Candidacy in the creation of a new Government if needed. It is not needed, but the President would like to stick with the Principles. As we mentioned in private, the CPK would be entitled to the Premiership, if they were not so hostile to Kalistan's governing principles. We would like to remind Comrade Morrison that it takes 2/3rds of the Assembly to change the constitution with regard to the Prerogative. We hope that the Leader of the CPK doesn't just rest on a trick of fate that put his Party into the Plurality, but rather votes in a way that demonstrates his commitment to Kalistan's institutions. -John Henry Bennots, Speaker of the SP. |
| Date | 05:09:00, November 04, 2018 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Correction: The current premier is not a conservative. I stand corrected. This is because the Workers Front became largest non-Presidential Party in the Coalition. -JH Bennots, SP Speaker. |
| Date | 01:34:08, November 07, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kalistan (CPK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Thank you Mr Speaker, My question is to The Minister for Finance, Mr Tim Vega. Could the Minister please update the house on any work the government is currently doing or has plans to implement which ensures a sound economic future for Kalistan as well as a country which encourages the private sector. Can the Minister also outline his views on the recent Future Proofing Economy bill proposed by the CPK. - Taylor Marten, Leader of the CPK |
| Date | 19:35:36, December 14, 2018 CET | From | United Equal Rights Council | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Mr. Premier, What is the policy that you or your cabinet uses to choose cabinet members? As I understand it, parties aren´t allowed to propose cabinets. Depending upon your answer, we will determine if we wish to amend that current law with certain restrictions to ensure that parties aren´t proposing cabinets repeatedly without thoughtful consideration but are allowed to have meticulous input. - Mr. Timothy O. Jackson, President of the United Equal Rights Council |
| Date | 01:52:15, December 15, 2018 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Comrade Jackson, I am unsure if the Premier will answer, but the policy to select the cabinet is that the plurality Party selects the cabinet. It is important that the largest party have a buy in. As one of the primary Parties defending the prerogative, we can say that the best way to ensure that there are not frivolous cabinet proposals made by Parties which have little chance of actually governing themselves, is to leave it with either the Presidential Party (who is often elected with a coalition) or with the plurality Party who can supply the most votes to the proposal. -John H. Bennots, Speaker of the SP o K |
| Date | 01:06:53, June 21, 2019 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kalistan (CPK) | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | My Question is the Leader of the Capitalist Freedom Party, How is the Capitalist Freedom Party able to still lead this nation after losing the support of the assembly? Has the party consulted officials about an early election? - Gladys Green, Premier of The Republic Conservative party of Kalistan |
| Date | 11:51:13, June 21, 2019 CET | From | Party for Capitalist Freedom | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Premier, We understand your concerns surrounding this issue, and we respect the fact that your party and the Centrist Party have become the de facto largest political force in the National Assembly, despite the PCF being the largest party, making it very difficult for our party to make any proposals which will have support of the majority of sitting members in the National Assembly. In terms of an early election, we see no need for this, there is no impass in the National Assembly |
| Date | 11:53:39, June 21, 2019 CET | From | Party for Capitalist Freedom | To | Debating the RP STICKY- Question Time (NON-VOTING) |
| Message | Furthermore, logistically, this is unnecessary since an election is scheduled in just a few months anyway. Thank you for your concerns though. Simon Green Leader of the Party for Capitalist Freedom in the National Assembly |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
| Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval. |
| Random quote: "A conservative is a man who sits and thinks, mostly sits." - Woodrow Wilson |