Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 03:15:54
Server time: 16:44:05, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | Dx6743 | Klexi | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Shorter Terms Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alorian Communist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2057

Description[?]:

At the moment, as there is not enough legislation, the game has reached a sort of stalemate. Most things, everyone agrees on and then the couple that people have differences with form the battlegrounds between elections. However, I dont think there is enough potential legislation to justify the current 4 year term. This makes the game slightly boring, as there are only a couple of bills proposed per term. If we had shorter terms, we could still propose the same bills, just there would be more opportunity to do so.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:22:54, May 24, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Shorter Terms Act
Messagehow many years are you thinking about making it?

Date15:11:15, May 24, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Shorter Terms Act
MessageYou do have a point. Let's try 3 years.

Date15:43:57, May 24, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Shorter Terms Act
MessageRCL- I think you're justification is a sound one. If I'm to be perfectly honest, I can't see anything that I'm going to change at the moment... 4 years is probably too long with that in mind...

Date16:39:54, May 24, 2005 CET
FromUnited Stalinist Front
ToDebating the Shorter Terms Act
MessageIs three years satisfactory? I'm hoping that with more government changeovers, different parties will have a chance to implement new policies which should spice things up a bit. Of course, when the economic system gets going and there are more legislation options we can change it back if neccessary.

Date16:40:13, May 24, 2005 CET
FromUnited Stalinist Front
ToDebating the Shorter Terms Act
MessageIf this is the case, then I will support this bill.

Date16:41:16, May 24, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Communist Party
ToDebating the Shorter Terms Act
MessageYes 3 years sounds fine. If we have the support of the Stalinists, the Greens, the Capitalists then I will put this to vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 206

no
 

Total Seats: 31

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

    Random quote: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character." - Martin Luther King Jr.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64