Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 00:56:49
Server time: 07:03:10, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Strong Military Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Milita and Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4063

Description[?]:

We propose the following:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:52:19, July 22, 2016 CET
FromRegionalist Coalition
ToDebating the Strong Military Act
MessageMadam Speaker,

A strong military is vital to our national security, and supporting our military is an honourable aim. However, there are several requests in this Bill which are simply outrageous. I draw the Senates attention to Articles 2, 8 and 10 in particular. The first two would permit the use of some of the most horrific and inhumane weapons known to man to be used for, and I quote, "any reason". The second would withdraw us from the committee of a humanitarian organisation, the work of which saves lives every day. That is simply indefensible. This Bill would reduce our military status to none better than that of a tinpot dictatorship; passing this Bill would not strengthen Beluzia, but make us enemies of humanity - hated, shunned and deplored. This would only reduce Beluzia's standing on the world stage.
As a result of the above objections, this Bill is entirely unsupportable.

Sen. Alfred Mayer
Defence Spokesperson, New Liberal Party

Date19:38:26, July 22, 2016 CET
FromSocialist Working Party
ToDebating the Strong Military Act
MessageThe so called Liberal Party which would advicate the use of the most dispicable, abhorrent and Inhumane weapons known to man, in the form of biological and chemical weapons and land mines which are completely indiscriminate and kill hundreds of thousands of innocents. The New Liberal Party which advocates questionable clandestine military intelligence operations abroad, the New Liberal Party which would see our children drafted in to military service and soldiers policing our streets. The New Liberal Party which would see us launching catastrophic, devestating nuclear weapons for 'any reason' while paramilitary thugs roam our streets.

I don't know about anyone else but New Liberalism is starting to sound an awful lot to us like old totalitarianism. Like old nationalism. Like good old fashioned fascism.

This bill is dangerous and is something we could never advocate or vote for.

Mike Smith,
Leader of the Socialist Working Party

Date21:12:02, July 22, 2016 CET
FromRegionalist Coalition
ToDebating the Strong Military Act
Message
TO BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR the NLP completely opposes this Bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
        

Total Seats: 750

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass.

    Random quote: "Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself, you can always write a book." - Ronald Reagan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 89