Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:34:07
Server time: 19:25:52, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | ChevaldelaMer | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Milita and Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4069

Description[?]:

We propose the following:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:33:42, August 02, 2016 CET
FromThe Milita and Freedom Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Act
MessageOn the teacher lead pray I would add that the children won't have to participate they can just watch or work on homewor.

Date18:58:07, August 02, 2016 CET
FromSocialist Progressive Alliance
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Act
MessageMadam Speaker,

We live in a country where half of the population is atheist and the other half is made up of a myriad of different religions, which is at the core of our multicultural society here in Beluzia. We would strongly oppose this act, as it is not about religious freedoms which are already protected, but for silently enforcing a religion upon our nation. We should not accept this, and neither should any other party which represents the will of the people of Beluzia.

Date19:06:14, August 02, 2016 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Act
MessageWhile we would happily support articles 1, 2 and 3, we are opposed to the rest of the bill. We believe in freedom of religion, and while this means respecting all religious groups we believe the state has no place in backing any particular religious ideology.

- Senator Elliot Mortisen, Libertarian Party Religious Affairs Spokesperson

Date19:06:15, August 02, 2016 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Act
MessageWhile we would happily support articles 1, 2 and 3, we are opposed to the rest of the bill. We believe in freedom of religion, and while this means respecting all religious groups we believe the state has no place in backing any particular religious ideology.

- Senator Elliot Mortisen, Libertarian Party Religious Affairs Spokesperson

Date22:49:58, August 02, 2016 CET
FromSocialist Working Party
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Act
Messagewe can not and will not vote for Article 4 and 5 of this proposal.

Date13:10:17, August 03, 2016 CET
FromKnights of the People
ToDebating the Religious Freedom Act
MessageThis is madness !

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
        

Total Seats: 669

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 87