Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:19:58
Server time: 18:40:01, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Regulation Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Aloria Green Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2177

Description[?]:

So you don't like regulation? Prove it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:37:09, January 29, 2006 CET
From Democratic Liberal Party
ToDebating the Anti-Regulation Bill
MessageWe'll support this.

Date02:19:17, January 29, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Anti-Regulation Bill
MessageA trap to make us regulator, eh? Well, it won't work. I made a 15-clause counter poison-pill bill to get back.

Date02:20:21, January 29, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Anti-Regulation Bill
MessageYou can't mess with the best at traps...

P.S. The current law actually makes the most sense in this situation.

Date15:05:22, January 29, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Anti-Regulation Bill
Messageooc: wasn't a trap- just what the AGSP believe. Bad RP old man.

Date18:03:37, January 29, 2006 CET
From Independent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Anti-Regulation Bill
MessageLet the games begin...

Date20:40:14, January 29, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Anti-Regulation Bill
MessageYou can't play games with peoples' lives!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 187

no
    

Total Seats: 385

abstain
 

Total Seats: 28


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "A theory that seems to explain everything is just as good at explaining nothing"- Christopher Hitchens

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57