We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Prevention of State Terror Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Socialists of Endralon
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2179
Description[?]:
| Nuclear weapons have only one purpose - to indiscriminately destroy the lives of innocent civilians. By possessing them we are not making our nation any safer and the LSE therefore proposes that we unilaterally disarm so as to set a positive example for the human race. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:12:25, January 30, 2006 CET | From |  League of Objectivists! | To | Debating the Prevention of State Terror Act |
| Message | The very invitation any rogue nation needs to attack us. Brilliant. |
| Date | 23:15:31, January 30, 2006 CET | From | el-militante Party | To | Debating the Prevention of State Terror Act |
| Message | i agree whole heartedly, in fact, i was just about to make a motion saying the same thing |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 233 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 39 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 227 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "There is only one corner of the universe you can be certain of improving, and that's your own self." - Aldous Huxley |