We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Infrastructure Reform Billl
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4098
Description[?]:
| This bill will improve our existing infrastructure facilities by achieving balance between public and private sector. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on airports.
Old value:: The government leaves airports entirely to the private sector.
Current: The government has some involvement in the ownership and operation of airports, but leaves a role for the private sector too.
Proposed: The government has some involvement in the ownership and operation of airports, but leaves a role for the private sector too.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: Private companies operate TOCs throughout the country.
Current: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Proposed: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:54:03, September 30, 2016 CET | From | National Republican Alliance (NRA) | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Billl |
| Message | We think that aiports should be left for private's to deal with Article 2 however we support but still we will vote no |
| Date | 22:15:53, September 30, 2016 CET | From |  Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Billl |
| Message | Why should private companies control Rutania's airports? They are a vital strategic asset, and should be publically owned and managed. It seems some parties put profit before all else. |
| Date | 22:15:54, September 30, 2016 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Billl |
| Message | Why should private companies control Rutania's airports? They are a vital strategic asset, and should be publically owned and managed. It seems some parties put profit before all else. |
| Date | 16:55:59, October 01, 2016 CET | From | Rutanian Green Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Billl |
| Message | While me and my party can see the benefits to having some state control over private enterprise, we agree as a collective party that we must maintain these important trade and transportation networks under private control. The cost of assuming state ownership could be large, and at the moment, our party does not see any benefit to increasing state involvement in an otherwise functioning system. We vote AGAINST. Jackson Ruhr |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 140 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 378 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 82 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle |