Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5480
Next month in: 00:21:50
Server time: 15:38:09, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): SocDemDundorfian | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of January 2179

Details

Submitted by[?]: Bodhist Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2180

Description[?]:

The Bodhist Liberal Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Independent Wantuni Republic.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:22:51, February 01, 2006 CET
FromPopulist Conservative Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of January 2179
MessageWill there still be a surplus afterwards?

Date09:35:46, February 01, 2006 CET
FromApathetic Sort-of-Federation
ToDebating the Budget proposal of January 2179
MessageYes, there would still be a surplus.

Date23:23:10, February 01, 2006 CET
FromBodhist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of January 2179
MessageYes, a surplus will still be maintained. The BLP would never make a budget proposition without making sure the government still had money left over.

Date09:21:16, February 02, 2006 CET
FromRed Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of January 2179
MessageSurplus budget+increase in health/education works for me. The Red Party supports this new budget.

Date01:29:05, February 03, 2006 CET
FromFederalists Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of January 2179
MessageWe question the need for such a large increase in the Health and Social Services budget since the government does not fund social welfare (at this time, anything is possible). We oppose.

Date01:32:07, February 03, 2006 CET
FromApathetic Sort-of-Federation
ToDebating the Budget proposal of January 2179
MessagePerhaps if some of the Health & SS allotment were moved over to Education & Culture?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 293

no
 

Total Seats: 61

abstain
   

Total Seats: 146


Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242

Random quote: "If you have an apple, and I have an apple, and we exchange the apples, then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea, and I have an idea, and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." - George Bernard Shaw

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65