Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5483
Next month in: 00:34:59
Server time: 19:25:00, May 14, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Withdrawal form the Pan-Dundorfian League Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Greyistische Demokraten

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4126

Description[?]:

The Pan-Dundorfian league is useless and the old Darnussian Republic was never included in any Pan-Dundorfian projects, Darnussian Dundorfians (Nariks) were always turning a back on this ideology. This league benefits only a handful of parties, if not less, and causes problems. It is not like the AU.

Der Vertrag von Merenbürg was created by Pan-Dundorfian monarchists who abolished the Republic and undermined Darnussian ideas of Freedom, Equality and Rationality and only brought problems from Dundorf to Darnussia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:43:56, November 26, 2016 CET
FromGreyistische Demokraten
ToDebating the Withdrawal form the Pan-Dundorfian League Act
MessageIt is extremely important for everyone to vote in favour, although if you vote against it's not a disaster, it would benefit everyone in Darnussia.
Real-life reference: This treaty reminds me of the awful Congress of Vienna.

Date12:50:27, November 26, 2016 CET
FromGroße Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten
ToDebating the Withdrawal form the Pan-Dundorfian League Act
MessageOf course Darnussia is included in Pan dundorfian projects. The GD are badly informed about the project. There is no use in leaving the Union

Paul von Dallor

Date13:19:31, November 26, 2016 CET
FromGreyistische Demokraten
ToDebating the Withdrawal form the Pan-Dundorfian League Act
MessageIt is currently involved and has been so since 3900s, but before that it never was and that was the time of the darnussian republic.

Date13:21:24, November 26, 2016 CET
FromGreyistische Demokraten
ToDebating the Withdrawal form the Pan-Dundorfian League Act
MessageWhat's the use of being in this council, then? To spread Pan-dundorfianism, admit it, it only favours your political party's values and completely undermines the need of the Darnussian people and has caused extreme political instability.

Date15:30:59, November 26, 2016 CET
FromGroße Reformpartei - Sozialdemokraten
ToDebating the Withdrawal form the Pan-Dundorfian League Act
MessageThere are parties with very different ideological views that favour the PDL. Our party has been the only one to represent it in Darnussia for a long period of time, that's true. But anyone may join the the league, so you argument is invalid. Why would anyone profit from leaving a union that supports cooperation between Dundorfian speaking countries. You have to be able to differentiate between the DDP's concept of Dundorfian privileges and the views of the PDL. The PDL is not like the DDP!

Frauke Dallor
Independent MP (former DDP member)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 150

no
   

Total Seats: 167

abstain
  

Total Seats: 32


Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 46