Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:39:02
Server time: 00:20:57, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Arusu-Gad | ImperialLodamun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Chamber Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partito Giustizialista

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4127

Description[?]:

OOC: Making the legislature more Italian-style.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:02:57, November 27, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Chamber Reform Act
MessageOOC: I could support and I propose 365 because an odd number avoid situation of perfect parity if there are two poles in competition (common situation in Istalia).

Date15:30:29, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Giustizialista
ToDebating the Chamber Reform Act
MessageOOC: But if it's 365, the whole point is gone, since the intention of this bill is to make it the same as in Italy :P

Date21:22:25, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito del Patriota d'Istalia
ToDebating the Chamber Reform Act
MessageThere should be an odd amount of seats.

Date22:33:38, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPopolari per l'Istalia - U.o.L.
ToDebating the Chamber Reform Act
MessageRP Parliamentary Rules of the Istalian Republic (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=481875):

[2] It's compulsory for the members of Parliament (players) to enter in the title of each bill that are going to propose to the Parliament the following specifications:

2.a) "D.d.l." (Disegno di legge): if it is a government's initiative bill, and therefore proposed by the government (through the parties that support him in parliament) after approval by the Council of Ministers;

2.b) "P.d.l." (Proposta di legge): in case the bill is proposed by a member of parliament individually or from his political group (in the opposition or into the government's majority).

2.c) If a D.d.l bill don't have none of two entries listed under the paragraph 2.a) and 2.b), this is considered as if it were a P.d.l. (non-governmental bill).

Date22:33:43, November 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito dei Democratici Istaliani
ToDebating the Chamber Reform Act
MessageGiovanni Sempliciti, Whip of DI-U.o.L. :
"We think that this reform will better represents citizens' vote, so we vote yes."

Date04:03:05, November 28, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Chamber Reform Act
MessageOOC: yes I know that this would like make the parliament in line with the Chamber in Italy, but without a ood number, as said, we risk to have cohalition or agreement between parties with same number of seat as the opposition.
An ood number avoid this situation, an ood number avoid stall.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 192

no
    

Total Seats: 413

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64