Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:58:48
Server time: 19:01:11, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ImperialLodamun | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Wage Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluz People's Party (BPP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4134

Description[?]:

One more step toward eliminating poverty in Beluzia

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:57:19, December 11, 2016 CET
FromFreedom Socialist Party
ToDebating the Wage Reform
MessageGreetings, friends!!!


As usual, your great parliamentaries are working and proposing reforms in the intent of abolishing social injustice and eliminating poverty and inequality in our great country. The only problem we have is that we don't really see how this changes would be benefficial to those intents we all have. If your party are willing to make an point and explain the reasonings behind the changes, we would happily listen and weight the arguments to make an final decision.

Article 1 is the biggest head-scratcher for us. Our current law provides an minimum wage big enough to maintain all workers "well above" the poverty line. The proposal will make an cut in said wage, friends. It would still be good enough, considering the worker would be able to support a family of four, but this is less than what we currently have. Considering what your party wishes to achieve with the changing, we believe keeping the currently law as it is would be better than chaning it.

Article 2 is more debatable, we think. But again, not for the purposes your party wishes to achieve. If the proposition were based in aliviating costs in the time of crisis, than we would understand the reasoning. But to better the lives of our workers? We fail to see how. Once again, we're always open for debating, but offering an optional private pension could open up some dangerous possibilities. First of all, we would be willing to concede such an vital social function of our state (in our perspective) to companies that are "naturally" profit-based. Their interests are not always in conformity with the betterment of the population because of that. But in addition, we would be unprotected against politicians deciding to act as lobbyist puppies and corruption in general. After all, it would be quite easy to someone with bad intentions in charge of the public machine to wreck the public pension system, forcing our worker to have to adopt private options. That would be good to the companies and banks that offers those plans. We are here to represent the people, though, not to bring benefits to the elite.


Dr. Douglas Coutinho
PhD in History and Education
President and Founder of the People's Coutinho Party

Date02:11:04, December 12, 2016 CET
FromBeluz People's Party (BPP)
ToDebating the Wage Reform
MessageOoc: I'm withdrawing the bill as I thought article 1 meant a wage increase. Everyone please vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 169

no
     

Total Seats: 272

abstain
 

Total Seats: 159


Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37

Random quote: "I got nothing against no Viet Cong. No Vietnamese ever called me a nigger." - Muhammad Ali, 1967, refusing to fight in Vietnam

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53