We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Legitimate Government Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4152
Description[?]:
| Justice Bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are allowed as part of each political party.
Current: Paramilitaries are allowed as part of each political party.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:26:24, January 16, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Legitimate Government Bill |
| Message | Clearly this individual has not read up on Kalistani history! We would all be speaking Indralan were it not for the militias! Franklin Foster, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 17:50:15, January 16, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Legitimate Government Bill |
| Message | I know my history, sir. We have no immediate enemies at the current time, so weaponising extreme political factions is ridiculous. Dustin Leo Defence Spokesperson for the Conservative Party |
| Date | 17:59:59, January 16, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Legitimate Government Bill |
| Message | If you know your history, explain how we would exist as a nation without the paramilitaries? The answer is we would not. You are deluded if you believe they are anything but beneficial to national defence and should be ashamed to call yourself a defence spokesperson. Franklin Foster, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 18:05:12, January 16, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Legitimate Government Bill |
| Message | If you want to live in the last century or even last millennium I will not try pull you to the present day. However, we want a force of defence whose priority is our nation and its democracy, not a particular ideology or party. Dustin Leo Defence Spokesperson for the Conservative Party |
| Date | 18:09:25, January 16, 2017 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Legitimate Government Bill |
| Message | What on Terra are you talking about? The militias defend the nation, just as the regular forces do! Without them, we wouldn't be able tod defend our people! Is that what you want- all Kalistanis to die? I am beginning to suspect you are a foreign agent. Franklin Foster, Labour Party General Secretary |
| Date | 22:28:24, January 16, 2017 CET | From | Peoples Party | To | Debating the Legitimate Government Bill |
| Message | The Peoples Party Guard would not call themselves radicalized. We are but a security force for our members. Every party member is offered protection. We agree with the Labour Party in that our history has been written by paramilitary forces. In addition, we have no need for police because these "radical" groups balance one another out. Major Chambers-Peoples Party Guard |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 750 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |