We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Indefinite Opposition Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Confederation Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4172
Description[?]:
| This act officially applies an Indefinite Opposition the National Socialist Worker's Party due to the radical beliefs of that party. These include, but are not limited to: The attempted withdraw from the Anti-Slavery Treaty The attempted withdraw from the Treaty for Racial Equality The attempted legalization of paramilitaries The attempted lifting of all restrictions regarding the police This act officially declares all parties that approve this act shall never vote in favor of any bill propose National Socialist Worker's Party. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:32:41, January 22, 2017 CET | From | Unionist Party | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | Although the NSWP does not respect basic human rights, outlawing a political party would set an extremely dangerous precedent. Therefore, the LUP will not support this resolution. |
| Date | 22:42:15, January 22, 2017 CET | From | National Socialist Worker's Party (NSWP) | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | "Such Contradictory from parties that believe in "democracy" and "freedom"...this is in violation of freedom of speech...you are the real extremists not us....however i want the Legislative body to remember this....you may outlaw our party....you may take my life......but National Socialism and The Will of the People shall live forever"-Haytham Kennedy Leader of the National Socialist Worker's Party |
| Date | 23:19:21, January 22, 2017 CET | From | National Progressive Party | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | I do not believe we should Outlaw the party, but I would not rule out a "Always Against" clause to the NSWP, where all parties vote against it Indefinitely. |
| Date | 23:41:24, January 22, 2017 CET | From | National Socialist Worker's Party (NSWP) | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | "The Attempts that might be considered racist were just to raise attention...we do not believe in racism....we believe in National Socialism....."-Haytham Kennedy Leader of the National Socialist Worker's Party |
| Date | 04:10:15, January 23, 2017 CET | From | Unionist Party | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | "Haytham, your party sponsored a bill to retract racial equality and allow slavery. Face the truth, you and you're party are a bunch of bigots and xenophobes! Stop trying to hid it by claiming you believe in in 'National Socialism', the people of Beluzia will see past your lies!" Assembly Leader Catherine Hamilton. |
| Date | 04:22:39, January 23, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | I'll report to Moderation. I am Nationmaster |
| Date | 09:57:09, January 23, 2017 CET | From | National Socialist Worker's Party (NSWP) | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | That was legislation for independance from unnecessary treaties we dont need the international community to dictate our laws |
| Date | 21:48:35, January 23, 2017 CET | From | The Confederation Party | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | The Confederation party has changed the Legislation to an "Indefinite Opposition" policy. |
| Date | 00:44:01, January 24, 2017 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the The Indefinite Opposition Act |
| Message | We cannot and will not vote for any proposal that includes either always voting against another party or outlawing one. We do not agree with their policies, but they have the right to make them, and they should not be indefinitely silenced. If there arenpeople within our nation who support their beliefs, why should they not be represented? Their policies are terrible, sure, but there should never be any action to silent a party or a people. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 134 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 191 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 425 |
| Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in. |
| Random quote: "The whole uncivilized bunch on the opposite benches can get stuffed." - Craig Warwick, former Dranian politician |