Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:42:54
Server time: 00:17:05, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Discussion: The Security Council of the World Congress

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4169

Description[?]:

Comrade Speaker of the National Assembly, Comrades of the Socialist Party, Members of the Government of Kalistan, and Deputies of the National Assembly,

We rise today to propose a sea change to our Nation's foreign policy.

When I began my career nearly more than sixty years ago in Kalistan, I fully supported our presence at the Security Council. My Party was among the chief cheerleaders of the Congress and the Council. In the intervening time, I have expatriated to Lourenne, served as the chief advisor to my Friend and Comrade, the Secretary General of Lourenne, and when she died, I returned to Kalistan.

Since my return I have been given the honor of serving you one more time in the twilight of my life. I have come to the understanding, throughout my years that Kalistan's role as a regional power is where it is strongest. I would like to give one of our neighbors a chance to serve in the Security Council in our stead, and let Kalistan move out of the center stage.

I would like for us to consider two questions, as a National Assembly:

1) Should Kalistan leave the Security Council behind. I have stated my preference, but the Foreign Minister has expressed that the Current Ambassador should keep their seat until the end of the term.

2) If we should leave the office, who should Kalistan support? Upon my return after my long absence, I don't think it is a shock that I am still catching up on Kalistani affairs, but it seems that we should support our allies.

I would like all Parties' input on these questions before crafting a more complete bill.

My thanks

Louise Bjorksdattir
Premier of the Republic

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:27:26, February 13, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Discussion: The Security Council of the World Congress
MessageIt has and remains the position of the Labour Party that continued Kalistani involvement in the Security Council is beneficial not only to Kalistan and Seleya as a whole but to Terra. In contrast to most nations on the Security Council, Kalistan consistently stands up for an unbiased and equal respect for sovereignty. We should not allow the most important international body to fall into the hands of what often seem like neo-colonialist nations.

Obviously, this makes the second question irrelevant but I would like us to consider, while we are on the topic, who we vote for in Seats A, B and D. Our current nominations arose primarily due to (somewhat shady) political dealing. We should take a fresh and carefully considered approach to who we now endorse. I view Trigunia as worthy of endorsement in Seat D but in Seat A and B, I would like us to perhaps switch our votes.

Stefaan Samuel
Labour Party General Secretary

Date17:31:45, February 13, 2017 CET
FromPeoples Party
ToDebating the Discussion: The Security Council of the World Congress
MessageOOC: You will have to excuse me from direct participation as my knowledge of the entire Terra is limited. However, I shall watch this discussion with interest. I hope to learn more about our Foreign Affairs.

Date23:04:21, February 16, 2017 CET
FromSocialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)
ToDebating the Discussion: The Security Council of the World Congress
MessageI will move a bill which promotes Trigunia into Seat D, changes our preference in seats A and B, and drops Kalistan out of Seat C.

Bennots.

Date20:22:11, February 19, 2017 CET
FromSocialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)
ToDebating the Discussion: The Security Council of the World Congress
MessageMoving to a vote for archival purposes

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 337

no
 

Total Seats: 93

abstain
   

Total Seats: 320


Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "The trouble with unemployment is that the minute you wake up in the morning you're on the job." - Slappy White

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 50