Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 00:08:16
Server time: 15:51:43, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Arusu-Gad | Arusu-Weareback | Paulo Nogueira | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Higher Education Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party for Classical Liberalism

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4170

Description[?]:

The Current System regarding Education is also not what the people of this country want.We propose partially Nationalising the education system so as to provide Free and High Quality Education to all of the Children if this great country.We also favour active Government Involvement into Creating,Funding and Maintaining Universities,Colleges and Vocational Training Institutions.

These Reforms are greatly needed and I hope that the right wing agrees.

Angela Smith

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:40:45, February 21, 2017 CET
From반동주의자당 (Bandongjuuijadang)
ToDebating the Higher Education Reform Act
MessageMr Speaker,

Kyo Tax payer money to pay for white brats education? No thanks! If we are going to be educating an inferior race, let the private sector at least profit from it!

Date03:09:07, February 22, 2017 CET
FromParty for Classical Liberalism
ToDebating the Higher Education Reform Act
MessageWhat to make of you guys,Fascists?You never like anybody other than yourselves and even Kyos Rejected your party in the last election and will reject you again!

Thomas Zang


Date07:54:33, February 22, 2017 CET
FromDruidic Popular Front
ToDebating the Higher Education Reform Act
MessageMr Speaker,

Kyo ethnofacists should be cheering at this proposal, as it would force those less well of into substandard public establishments and only give freedom of choice to those who can afford it, increasing segregation as well. We support financing education, but it should be delivered by private establishments that compete with each other, because they're always do a better job. Also, we know that some things like dyslexia and ADHD is more prevalent among the less well off and freedom of choice is even more important for those.

Ragnar Håkansen
Minister of Education and Culture

Date15:51:45, February 22, 2017 CET
FromParty for Classical Liberalism
ToDebating the Higher Education Reform Act
MessageWho told public institutions are substandard has the Druidic Folk joined with the rest of the right wing in spouting out lies?Look at Hutori,Look at Places like Kazulia,See how good the Public Education System is,Does the honourable Minister Whose name suggests that he is a Fellow Kazulian Immigrant/of Kazulian Descent like me,that the Public education system in Kazulia is doing great?

Angela Smith

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 202

abstain
   

Total Seats: 48


Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60