Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:06:17
Server time: 20:53:42, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious freedom act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Greater Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4174

Description[?]:

To promote religious freedom

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:46:56, February 27, 2017 CET
FromNew Democrats
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageHaving respect for the separation of church and state, we oppose. Why should religious organizations not be taxed, even for non-charitable activities?

--
Maria Rodriguez, Democratic Party Spokeswoman

Date23:36:01, February 27, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageWe oppose.

Stefaan Samuel
Labour Party General Secretary

Date23:59:00, February 27, 2017 CET
FromKalistan First
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageWe fully support.

Date15:13:10, February 28, 2017 CET
FromSocialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageArticle 2 is a non-starter for us.

Frank Bennots- Premier of the Republic

Date17:16:11, March 02, 2017 CET
FromNew Democrats
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageWhy has the Socialists abandoned their platform of mandatory vaccination? By voting yes on this proposal, they put our children at risk for preventable disease.

--
Maria Rodriguez, Democratic Party Spokeswoman

Date18:38:48, March 02, 2017 CET
FromGreater Party
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageYes but it is there choice to get it. If they don't want it to bad for them

Date20:37:42, March 02, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageIt is something of a surprise that the SP held that view to begin with. If that bill were presented without the religious schools proposal attached, we would entirely support.

Valerie Appelmans
Labour Party General Secretary

Date23:44:33, March 02, 2017 CET
FromSocialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)
ToDebating the Religious freedom act
MessageTo be honest, we are fine with either option. Personal Choice or not- the program is in place...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 480

no
   

Total Seats: 270

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

Random quote: "I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and a woman." - Arnold Schwarzenegger

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74