We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Taxation Proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Front Canrillaise
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2184
Description[?]:
| The Right-Wing Extremists propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the New Rildanor. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 5
Current: 16
Proposed: 7
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 3
Current: 25
Proposed: 5
Article 3
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
| Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
| > 2,500 RCR | 5% | 7,274,000,000 RCR |
| > 5,000 RCR | 15% | 31,295,000,000 RCR |
| > 10,000 RCR | 25% | 45,345,000,000 RCR |
| > 20,000 RCR | 35% | 26,189,000,000 RCR | Total | 110,103,000,000 RCR |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:08:27, February 10, 2006 CET | From |  Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the National Taxation Proposal |
| Message | I increased taxes in other areas so that people aren't overburdened because of our high income taxes. The extra income will also allow me to increase funding in our future budget. |
| Date | 00:37:49, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the National Taxation Proposal |
| Message | I don't believe the first and second articles are high enough to justify the cuts in the income tax. If you'd increase them slightly though, I think we could agree. We're not against income tax cuts as long they're balanced by other sources of revenue, and we're thankful that you had the good sense NOT to increase taxes on necessary goods. |
| Date | 04:41:40, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the National Taxation Proposal |
| Message | Don't worry, I did the math and we will get billions more in extra money. We feel this is enough and I will increase our spending later on if this passes. I didn't increase the essential goods tax because we're already going to get quite a bit from this increase. |
| Date | 15:41:54, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the National Taxation Proposal |
| Message | This is a big step forward, we thank the RWE and are glad to support this proposal. |
| Date | 14:22:46, February 12, 2006 CET | From | Proletariat Coalition | To | Debating the National Taxation Proposal |
| Message | If it adds up, I'm for. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 505 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli |