We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Conservateur Libertaire
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4197
Description[?]:
This bill hereby removes us from the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty. Since it is outdated we believe that we should repeal it in order to allow for this new government to form its own allies and relationships with other countries. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Kazulian Diplomatic Center.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:32:09, April 14, 2017 CET | From | Parti Conservateur Libertaire | To | Debating the Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195 |
Message | Mr Speaker, I would first like to congratulate Le Parti Libertaire on its taking of Government, just four years after its formation. We will strive towards a greater Lourenne, and part of that includes renewing and forging relationships with other nations. This bill therefore withdraws a treaty that is now no longer required as we are planning to introduce many more with other nations. William Chauveau, Head of Government |
Date | 23:27:12, April 15, 2017 CET | From | Alliance Radicale | To | Debating the Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195 |
Message | M. Modérateur, M. Chauveau, I will join in congratulating the PCL on its win in the recent election. Nevertheless, we feel this move is mistaken. Forging new alliances does not mean breaking old ones, and the treaty in question gives protection not only to Kazulia but also to the territorial integrity of all nations. Whether one is nationalist or internationalist, it makes no difference: nationalists should support the treaty for reinforcing our national sovereignty; internationalists for forging alliances and bonds between nations which encourage cooperation and multilateral, as opposed to unilateral, action. Jacques Bertrand on behalf of the AP. |
Date | 01:34:21, April 16, 2017 CET | From | Parti Conservateur Libertaire | To | Debating the Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195 |
Message | M. Modérateur, Jacques Bertrand, The PCL would like to point to its internationalist record regarding foreign relations and can ensure the AP that we strive for a greater bond with other nations. However, we feel that we need the ability to reestablish terms to suit this modern world. This treaty was formed back in 3846, and we feel it no longer holds prevalence in this modern age. We would be delighted if the AP worked alongside us to discuss the redrafting of this treaty with other nations to suit our modern day needs. Let us not think of this as breaking old alliances, but instead, refreshing them. M. William Chauveau, Premier Officier |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 350 | |
no | Total Seats: 0 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302 |
Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli |