Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:08:58
Server time: 20:51:01, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JourneyKan | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195

Details

Submitted by[?]: Parti Conservateur Libertaire

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4197

Description[?]:

This bill hereby removes us from the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty. Since it is outdated we believe that we should repeal it in order to allow for this new government to form its own allies and relationships with other countries.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:32:09, April 14, 2017 CET
FromParti Conservateur Libertaire
ToDebating the Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195
MessageMr Speaker,

I would first like to congratulate Le Parti Libertaire on its taking of Government, just four years after its formation. We will strive towards a greater Lourenne, and part of that includes renewing and forging relationships with other nations. This bill therefore withdraws a treaty that is now no longer required as we are planning to introduce many more with other nations.

William Chauveau,
Head of Government

Date23:27:12, April 15, 2017 CET
FromAlliance Radicale
ToDebating the Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195
MessageM. Modérateur, M. Chauveau,

I will join in congratulating the PCL on its win in the recent election. Nevertheless, we feel this move is mistaken. Forging new alliances does not mean breaking old ones, and the treaty in question gives protection not only to Kazulia but also to the territorial integrity of all nations. Whether one is nationalist or internationalist, it makes no difference: nationalists should support the treaty for reinforcing our national sovereignty; internationalists for forging alliances and bonds between nations which encourage cooperation and multilateral, as opposed to unilateral, action.

Jacques Bertrand on behalf of the AP.

Date01:34:21, April 16, 2017 CET
FromParti Conservateur Libertaire
ToDebating the Withdrawal of the Kazulian Diplomatic Centre Treaty, October 4195
MessageM. Modérateur, Jacques Bertrand,

The PCL would like to point to its internationalist record regarding foreign relations and can ensure the AP that we strive for a greater bond with other nations. However, we feel that we need the ability to reestablish terms to suit this modern world. This treaty was formed back in 3846, and we feel it no longer holds prevalence in this modern age. We would be delighted if the AP worked alongside us to discuss the redrafting of this treaty with other nations to suit our modern day needs. Let us not think of this as breaking old alliances, but instead, refreshing them.

M. William Chauveau,
Premier Officier

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 350

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

    Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44