Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:23:19
Server time: 04:36:40, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Malivian Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4198

Description[?]:

We, the Malivian Socialist Party presents an administrative mandate that creates the highest judiciary in Malivia, the Malivian Supreme Court.

SECTION ONE: Identity

1. The supreme court is officialy known as the Malivian Supreme Court.

2. The supreme court consists of 11 politically independent judges that serves a lifelong term with a choice of resignation, if wanted or requested.

SECTION TWO: Powers and Responsibilities

1. The Supreme Court has the highest judiciary powers in the whole country.

2. The Supreme Court is the one that handles the day by day running of regional courts around Malivia.

3. The Supreme Court is the ome that can only hold impeachment trials.

III. Registry of Judges

1. Judges would be appointed by their performance in their duties.

2. The Minister of Justice appoints the judges in the Registry.

Chief Justice:
Deputy Chief Justice:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:
Judge:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:45:39, April 18, 2017 CET
FromBlackshirts
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageI would support this bill, but how would they be appointed?

Date04:04:18, April 19, 2017 CET
FromBlackshirts
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageIn a nonpartisan way, I mean.

Date04:24:36, April 19, 2017 CET
FromUnity Labour Party
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageHow will they be appointed?

Date04:28:31, April 19, 2017 CET
FromBlackshirts
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageHoS appoints them.

Date07:28:52, April 19, 2017 CET
FromUnity Labour Party
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageI have an issue with the Head of State appointing judges because what if the Judge is on trial? Will the judge not be more inclined to rule in favour of the President?

I think the judges should be appointed by an independent body

Date14:53:22, April 19, 2017 CET
FromUnity Labour Party
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageThe minister of justice is a politician. What if the minister of justice becomes the evry person on trial? Judges should not be chosen by politicians else that would surely not make them politically independent.
Imagine if the minister of justice is on an impeachment trial.
Also I do not think the judiciary should handle impeachment in first phase. That should be done by Parliament and once it's passed, if the impeachment is of a criminal nature, then it goes into the judiciary. What if an executive member is impeached simply for misconduct in public office that isn't criminal, should they also be handled by the judiciary and waste courts time and resources?
Therefore, with all that said , my political party cannot support this bill as we believe there are some issues that need to be ironed out. However we do commend the MSP for trying and maybe the government will place this on its agenda for this term.

Date16:05:32, April 19, 2017 CET
FromWind of Change
ToDebating the Formation of the Supreme Court of Malivia
MessageIf the judges are chosen by the minister of Justice they might not be independent.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 224

no
   

Total Seats: 476

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "Thousands of Zardic soldiers were sacrificed so that the Zardic government could gain control of a few buildings and Theodoro could pretend to be Augustus the Great. This is the kind of jingoistic ideology Zardugal would bring to the Security Council. They will throw countless lives away in pursuit of former glory." - Prince Akhaias, former Coburan royal

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53