We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Environment Bill of 2184
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2185
Description[?]:
| The leader of the Democratic Socialist Party, having been attacked by a swarm of killer bees, has turned against mother earth in a temporary lapse of sanity. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: The government promotes and subsidises forest clearance.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Presiding Minister of the Committee of Regions
Current:
| Prif Weinidog (Prime Minister) |
Proposed: First Minister
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Current: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government does not have a national park system policy.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: Local governments may set plantation policy.
Current: Local governments may set plantation policy.
Proposed: The government discourages tree plantation.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Current: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Proposed: The government does not regulate the quality of drinking water.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:55:02, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | We will abstain in disgust at this DISGUSTING MEGA BILL THAT HAS MORE THAN 5 CLAUSES! The Anti-Aloria Coalition has gone back on the truce and will be dealt with accordingly at the proper time. |
| Date | 00:56:49, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | It has 5 legislative clauses and one constitutional ammendment. |
| Date | 00:58:35, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | It is still a dirty go-around of the agreed system. It also is a bill that simply screws up visibilities. We will retaliate. Now. |
| Date | 00:59:18, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | It doesn't screw up visibilities. It's all on the one thing - environment! |
| Date | 01:04:29, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | Yes it will screw up visibilities. It will make those choose between federalism and environment. It will make antifederalists look federalists and anti-environmentalists look like environmentalists. Vote for the early election bill OR THE ALORIA COALITION WILL MAKE BILLS TO MAKE YOU LOOK: *Unitarist *Restrictive *Environmentalist *Isolationist *Big Gov't *Regulator *Pacifist *Conservative |
| Date | 01:15:43, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | Actually it will make federalists look more environmentalist. In case you hadn't noticed, environment is of 'Small' importance. |
| Date | 01:18:24, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | No, it's very important in Krentori, a region I target. That is why I hate you. And that is why I made a 19 clause bill to counter it. |
| Date | 01:42:02, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | Haha. |
| Date | 23:22:41, February 13, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti-Environment Bill of 2184 |
| Message | This is concerning... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 74 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 368 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 158 |
| Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
| Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen |