We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Objector Act of 4205
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4206
Description[?]:
Speaker, We believe that no one has a good reason to object serving for his or her country, which is why we propose that you may only object from serving on the battlefield, but not from a deskjob. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards civilians who conscientiously object to being required to perform military service (if applicable).
Old value:: Conscientious objectors are exempted.
Current: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Proposed: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 259 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 176 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 70 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "I never dared to be radical when young. For fear it would make me conservative when old." - Robert Frost |