Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5477
Next month in: 01:20:17
Server time: 22:39:42, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): hexaus18 | LC73DunMHP | PortCrab | Sam678 | TaMan443 | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Agiculture Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: League of Redheads

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2186

Description[?]:

Protection of citizens until further research on GM, and to regulate fishing

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:39:44, February 13, 2006 CET
From People's Communist Party
ToDebating the Agiculture Act
MessageWe mildly support the prohibition on fishing. While depletion of fish is a major issue, to have any serious impact, many nations would have to agree to a treaty to have any real impact; however, we would like to make any contributions that we can to halting the slide in fish populations, which will ultimately decimate our fishing industry and our ecology.

We are undecided on our stance regarding GM foods. Our greatest issue with GM foods relates to the patenting of life and so called 'terminator genes' which prevent crops from reproducing. Patent fees and difficulty selling our grains to pickier overseas markets have led to a decrease in farmer income. As GM foods are capable of cross-contamination, our organic farmers have taken a terrible hit, and one has even been thrown in jail for willful patent infringement after wind-blown GM soybeans were discovered on his field. He also has pending civil suits from customers for selling contaminated product.

Certain genetic modifications, such as pesticide resistance, are likely to cause a massive increase in the use of DDT and other legal but terribly harmful chemicals. Many of our sacred killer whales have had trouble reproducing because of the massive amount of DDT that they concentrate in their bodies. Other modifications, such as having the plants produce human vitamins, appear to be quite beneficial.

If patents, or at least patents on lifeforms, were abolished, then would have reservations about article 2; however, we support the bill considering that we are unlikely to get a repeal of patent law soon considering how much money certain industries have been giving to the ruling parties.

In short, we support this bill, even if we might have some reservations.

Date16:52:57, February 13, 2006 CET
From National Front
ToDebating the Agiculture Act
MessageYour bills are ridiculous.

Date17:13:38, February 13, 2006 CET
From Christian Democrats
ToDebating the Agiculture Act
MessageThe Christian Democrats are against this bill entirely. We are generally against government regulation; we are against it double so when it infringes on people as individuals. Let the people fish. Let the people buy what foods they wish.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 0

no
    

Total Seats: 151

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "In our age, there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia." - George Orwell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59