We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Liberalisation of Marriage
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2186
Description[?]:
Aloria should not be a nation where puritanical laws can be established which discriminate against either partner in a marriage. In line with sex equality laws, marriages should be less restrictive. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are prohibited.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Local governments decide who can initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:59:32, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Nope. We are a confederacy. Long live the Confederacy! |
Date | 12:18:33, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Devolve the power further ICP- to the individual! Local government control is still control. |
Date | 12:19:08, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | But you don't do any thing out of ideological motivation. You're only in it for the votes... |
Date | 13:08:12, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Lies, the Aloria Coalition is for the preservation of the Great Confederacy, this means leaving things up to local gov'ts even though all regions probably will have the same laws on their books. |
Date | 14:00:42, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | I like these ammendments |
Date | 17:04:46, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | And, the ICP proves my point. |
Date | 21:38:43, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Look, there is NO PARTY IN ALORIA that is for restricting divorce. However, we want to keep it at the local levels for the sake of preserving the Confederacy. First it's marraige, then we eliminate local gov'ts all together, then the fascists will try to take power and oppress. That is why a Confederacy preserves freedom. The less nat'l gov't, the less chance of nat'l abuse. |
Date | 22:08:16, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | However a national government could simply revoke the rights of the local governments and enforce its own anti-divorce laws anyway. |
Date | 22:22:50, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Which would bring about the end of the Confederacy. Sorry, the ICP is against this. |
Date | 23:36:17, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | You are willing to oppress the people because of your dogma? |
Date | 23:44:47, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Like I said, there is no party left in Aloria that will oppress. All the Confederacy does is allow people to choose on a more local level. |
Date | 23:49:36, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | Do we trust the local politicians though? Let people choose for themselves here- that is the most local level. |
Date | 23:51:11, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Liberalisation of Marriage |
Message | In a particracy like Aloria, it is rule by the parties. Everyone votes the party line. Seeing as no national parties (parties big enough to ever get enough say in local gov'ts) are pro-divorce, we'll allow it just on a more local level. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 189 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 369 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
Random quote: "They can call us communists and fascists all they want but, their words are of a hollow ring with the blood of innocence at their feet." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |