We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Allied Nations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independent Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2186
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Allied Nations. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. Normally the ICP is against outside treaties, but this is not one that restricts but one that will protect our sovereignty. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:26:39, February 14, 2006 CET |
From |  Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Allied Nations | | Message | The bill to join the Axis was a trap bill and not intentional, I admit the ICP overreacted there. However, we did not invite the Axis to move troops into our waters. That was a misunderstanding apparantly. And the only way to remedy this is international support to get the Axis away. Let internal affairs be solved internally, let external affairs (ie. big Deltarian army off shore) be solved united and externally. Don't bring politics into national survival! |
| Date | 22:38:36, February 14, 2006 CET |
From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Allied Nations | | Message | Let me make an analogy. This is like 9 people trapped indoors with an axe murderer outdoors. We could either band together and at least have a chance of chasing him away or fight between each other until he chops down the door and kills us ALL. When it comes to survival, politics are secondary. Sure, Aloria's always been divided but we should at least act as one unit when repealing a foreign power. We need to defend our right to disagree! Either side without the other to keep it in check would be too corrupt and wrong. There's an opposition for a reason.
Never before has Aloria resorted to terrorism, never in modern history have Alorians been threatened by a common enemy like this. We need to fight united against Deltaria or die trying. We would fight for our right to disagree, it is a democracy power will shift back and forth occassionally as people's views shift and favors change. Don't let politics resort to violence or division that will allow imperialistic opportunists turn us into another Lodamun. Fix our internal problems in the parliament, but keep united in terms of mutual survival. If Deltaria invades, they won't shoot only ACers or anti-ACers. They'll shoot all Alorian citizens alike. Similarly, should we not be united againt THEM? |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 558 |
| no | Total Seats: 0 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them!
Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses."
~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |
