We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Re-affirmation of Arms Act 4219
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4220
Description[?]:
| An Act to re-affirm the House's commitment to the Luthorian military arms and rights |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:12:37, June 01, 2017 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Re-affirmation of Arms Act 4219 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This Act is designed to give the House a choice. Support these arms by voting no, or support the end of these arms for our military by voting yes. The RCP supports our military and our means to win wars, especially with the threats from Vanaku, so will vote NO. James Stinson Deputy Leader of the RCP |
| Date | 23:02:19, June 01, 2017 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Re-affirmation of Arms Act 4219 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Although we do not support the use of chemical weapons, nuclear weapons maintain our sovereignty through the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. This party will not gamble with the security of the Republic and I urge this house to vote no. Stewart Pond Leader of the Libertarian Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 127 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 223 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "More Medicament Manufacture take the profits, workers take the factory" - Boros Norbert, former Endralonian businessman |