We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Consolidation Act 4220
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthori Ironguard
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4221
Description[?]:
| This bill aims to change the following for the protection of the citizenry and the minimization of damage by riotous actions. A police force that is backed by the military will be able to assist in riotous situations to avoid extensive damage or drawn out effects of continued dissidence. We are not attempting to cut out dissidence as much as we are trying to strengthen our ability to deal with problematic protests that may affect the efficiency of our glorious nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:23:00, June 03, 2017 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Police Consolidation Act 4220 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We just changed this with the Independent Policing Act, we will not revert to military interference in civilian matters unless in emergency. James Stinson Deputy Leader of the RCP |
| Date | 12:21:33, June 03, 2017 CET | From | Luthori Ironguard | To | Debating the Police Consolidation Act 4220 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The Independent Policing Act was a mistake and only causes more harm to our society. Stronger control in case of disruption is what we need to ensure the continual efficiency of our society. Societal efficiency will ensure greater bounds in production and less money needed to be diverted to clean up operations. I am sure the Socialist Parties of this country will ensure there will be no mistreatment of the common man, so there is nothing to worry about. Mark Levane Luthori Ironguard |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 162 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 117 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 121 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "It will be years, not in my time, before a woman will become Prime Minister." - Margaret Thatcher |