We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sports Club Act 4220
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4221
Description[?]:
An Act to make private sports clubs a right, without public interference |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: Local governments decide the funding policy of sports clubs.
Current: Local governments decide the funding policy of sports clubs.
Proposed: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:53:47, June 04, 2017 CET | From | Patriots Party | To | Debating the Sports Club Act 4220 |
Message | Mr Speaker, We think that the government should fund certain socially beneficial clubs and this is why we oppose this bill. Peter Wright MP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 23 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 256 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 121 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt |