Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5476
Next month in: 03:41:24
Server time: 20:18:35, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (9): caesar8293_ | DanivonX | dannypk19 | dnobb | GLNBei | hexaus18 | MbitesCildania | Ost | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Environmental Reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Valruzia

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4223

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:17:45, June 06, 2017 CET
From Federal Ecologist Party
ToDebating the Environmental Reforms
MessageThe Eco-Federalists are truly worried about this bill because we need to choose between two of our core, bedrock beliefs. Either ecological protection, or federalisation. Because of this we must abstain from this vote. *mutters* Like affects anything...

Liam Raymond
President of the Federal Ecologist Party

Date18:21:43, June 07, 2017 CET
From Communist Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Environmental Reforms
MessageIt seems as if federalization and environmentalism don't always mix. We feel that federalization can lead to disorder when it comes to economic policy. There is only one Terra.

Michael Rogers
Chancellor of the Free Valruzian Union

Date18:33:43, June 07, 2017 CET
From Communist Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Environmental Reforms
Message*environmental, not economic (although we feel that federalization can lead to disorder with respect to economic policy as well),

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 211

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 69


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "Racism isn't born, folks; it's taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list." - Dennis Leary

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59