Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:34:44
Server time: 20:25:15, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Drugs cleaning sanitization process

Details

Submitted by[?]: Frente Nacional Radical Extrema Derecha

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4225

Description[?]:

We still encourage our fight against drug consumption and old unhealthy habits.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:52:39, June 11, 2017 CET
FromPartido Eco-Animalista
ToDebating the Drugs cleaning sanitization process
MessageDo you remember the US Dry Law and his consecuences. The most famous person of this era was Al Capone.

Date01:56:47, June 12, 2017 CET
FromFrente Nacional Radical Extrema Derecha
ToDebating the Drugs cleaning sanitization process
MessageWell, I understand your point of view: in the one hand one can say "bad things" are emancipated when drowns under prohibition. On the other hand, "bad things" must be prohibited by default, or principles.
For instance, "nuclear contamination unregulation for private business".. if you run the first statement, so, the prohibition will increase the infringement ocurrences. Anycase is prohibited, and viable to prosecute through sanctions... However under the 2nd statement it hasn't be reinforced by the restriction. The consequences will be the same.
More examples in the same way, child pornography exploitation, sexual slave traffic, free access to dangerous chemicals for personal attacks, etc, etc.
We cant suppose always that if we prohibited issues then they will be increased, by magic act. Some things deserve be prohibited because endanger people, affects fundamental rights and arent good for people.
Why should we await for reaching the civilization collapse before to take the right actions since the early first.
That's the FNRED point of view, about these social problems, we can and must avoid.

Date02:02:48, June 12, 2017 CET
FromFrente Nacional Radical Extrema Derecha
ToDebating the Drugs cleaning sanitization process
MessageHowever the most probable is this bill will be cancelled by now, because needs more elaboration in deep.
I would wish that more specific proposals were available on the legislation proposal type menu.

Date02:04:10, June 12, 2017 CET
FromFrente Nacional Radical Extrema Derecha
ToDebating the Drugs cleaning sanitization process
MessageThanks for your participation Partido Eco-Animalista and sharing your thoughts.

Date14:40:46, June 12, 2017 CET
FromRepublicano Liberal
ToDebating the Drugs cleaning sanitization process
MessageWe dont support prohibitions based on paternalism and the reduction of the civil rights of the citizens by telling them what they have to do with their lives.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 46

no
    

Total Seats: 106

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

    Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61