We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cuts of MP's and Government Officials Salaries Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sons of the Republic Movement
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4239
Description[?]:
| Following legislation cuts MP's and Government Officials salaries. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The salaries of members of parliament and/or government.
Old value:: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a comparatively large salary.
Current: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a comparatively average salary.
Proposed: Members of parliament and/or government are entitled to a comparatively average salary.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:26:27, July 08, 2017 CET | From |  Sons of the Republic Movement | To | Debating the Cuts of MP's and Government Officials Salaries Bill |
| Message | Mr Speaker, currently our MP's and government officials are entitled to a very large salary. Unachievable for many of our citizens. We believe, that public service should be, well, service. Now we see it more like an attractive career track. We can argue whatever MP's should be paid or not, but I believe we can all agree that they should not be earning so much. Let's give them... us, average salary. After all, you are all here to serve, not to earn profits. Am I right? Jacob Rose, SoRM National Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 233 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 87 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |