We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP: Joint Resolution of Luthori and Narikaton und Darnussia
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4240
Description[?]:
| RP: Joint Resolution of Luthori and Narikaton und Darnussia The Patriots House of Luthori and the Bundestag of Narikaton und Darnussia do hereby recognise that peace is the ultimate goal between both nations, and that they both have a responsibility to facilitate this. Therefore, both bodies do agree to the following; -A reduction of military personnel at the 'Wall' to be scaled at 10% every year, for 5 years, until the 'Wall' is 50% de-militarised. If an overall deal is met, this should continue at a rate of 20% until all military forces are replaced by a joint civilian police border force. -Ban on increases in military number effective immediately. Arms may still be present at checkpoints with a civilian police border force. -The withdrawal of all armoured vehicles, anti-aircraft, anti-tank and artillery weapons from the 'Wall', maintaining a distance of 2 miles. -Joint military exercises will be conducted at the Wall annually in August, co-ordinated by the Ministries of Defence in both nations. -Joint recreational activities will be undertaken regularly, co-ordinated by the Ministries of Defence in both nations. Once the Wall is de-militarised, both nations shall meet in Fort William, Luthori, to discuss the dismantling of the 'Wall' and in Merengurg, Narikaton und Darnussia to discuss moving forward without the 'Wall'. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 273 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 42 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 85 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Hunger makes a thief of any man." - Pearl S. Buck |