We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to Life
Details
Submitted by[?]: Baltusian Green Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4255
Description[?]:
| We are going to appeal to the supreme court should this legislation not pass. Albert Hare BGA Chairman |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy of the government concerning the funding of abortions
Old value:: The government provides funding for abortions.
Current: The government provides funding for abortions.
Proposed: The government only funds abortions for medical emergencies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Current: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Proposed: Euthanasia is only allowed with consent from the patient and a court order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:52:16, August 10, 2017 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Right to Life |
| Message | Members of Parliament, A majority of our party support this legislation therefore we will vote in favour. Brian Bugmuller Republican Leader |
| Date | 16:10:20, August 10, 2017 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Right to Life |
| Message | RECOMMENDATION OF LAW TO THE: BALTUSIAN GREEN ALLIANCE: In line with Article IX of the Constitutional Amendment titled Batusian Deceleration of Rights and Constitutional Court: "issue a 'statement of unconstitutionality' when legislation CONTRADICTS the rights outlined within the Declaration of Rights. In these circumstances, Congress should consider REPEALING or AMENDING the specific legislation however they are not obliged to. The Green Alliance wouldn't be able to take this bill itself to the Constitutional Court and instead should take the bills enforcing the current law they wish to change to the Constitutional Court. For example, the recommended bills relating to this legislation to take to the Constitutional Court would therefore be: - http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=533242 Which makes abortion allowed up until the beginning of the third trimester. - The one which made euthanasia allowed with consent from the patient and treating doctor. James Martin QC Prosecuting Barrister |
| Date | 18:22:52, August 10, 2017 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the Right to Life |
| Message | This Bill should not be taken to the constitutional court if it does not pass as it is not included in the constitution |
| Date | 18:29:58, August 10, 2017 CET | From | Baltusian International Democratic Party | To | Debating the Right to Life |
| Message | The euthanasia bill would be : http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=525044 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 256 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 295 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
| Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
| Random quote: "I am not a vegetarian because I love animals; I am a vegetarian because I hate plants." - A. Whitney Brown |