We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: An Act to stop Bill Spamming
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2190
Description[?]:
| Tax and Spend has made people angry, let's not let Tax and Spend be banned but instead make an ammendment to solve this problem. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 8
Current: 20
Proposed: 2
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 15
Current: 50
Proposed: 5
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:58:46, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Hopefully we can pass this and stop any problems for the future |
| Date | 23:59:47, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Sounds like a fair compromise |
| Date | 00:00:14, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Sounds like a fair compromise |
| Date | 00:13:12, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | I never truly determined what these limits do. For example, if we would only recieve 2 proposals a year, that would only be 1/6 of a proposal a month. So I would only be able to create one bill with one proposal after 6 months? |
| Date | 00:19:28, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | no no, you would be able to create 2 proposals each in game month. |
| Date | 00:31:26, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Proposal to change The number of proposals a party can introduce ***per year*** (will be handed out as a monthly quota). That's what I don't understand, this says per year. |
| Date | 05:38:25, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Yes, I think what that means is we start the year with one proposal allowed, then 6 months later, get another, for a total of 2 per year |
| Date | 08:37:29, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | That seems like way too few. |
| Date | 20:47:58, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | It means that the most proposals you can do is 5, and that each in game month you get 2 proposals, but you can never have more then five. |
| Date | 23:14:33, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | In the interests of preventing the current abuses, I'll vote for this. But I plan to calculate other possbiilites later. |
| Date | 21:33:19, February 24, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | No longer fucking necessary. |
| Date | 02:32:25, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Sure seems like it given your "AID" bill... |
| Date | 05:48:18, February 25, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam! |
| Date | 06:42:37, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | Ugh... I find spam too salty for my tastes. |
| Date | 14:33:28, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the An Act to stop Bill Spamming |
| Message | The Japanese use it to make sushi |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 71 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 25 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 4 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius |