Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:27:00
Server time: 06:32:59, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261

Details

Submitted by[?]: Grüne Demokratische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4261

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:25:10, August 23, 2017 CET
FromGrüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

It makes only sense that the cabinet and President can be at one with one-another. Furthermore, we believe that the Progressives and Forwards have proven themselves over their histories to be reasonable, level-headed governors who we would be more than happy to coalition with. Moreover, the Traisheims would make a good fit for the Chancellorship position.

Louisa Untermann
Leader of Pragmatiker

Date18:49:20, August 23, 2017 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

We are absolutely baffled as to why the smallest party in the State Council has been given the privilege of State Chancellor, but we will support this proposal for the sake of security!

TBD, Leader of the Progress Party

Date19:00:39, August 23, 2017 CET
FromGrüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

We want to state clearly to Forwards that they would be far more greatly respected and appreciated in this coalition than the current one, which has already failed on their attempt to rejoin the AU.

This new coalition, we can assure Forwards, would be best for Dorvik. We choose it only out of Dorvik's need for a sensible, centre-right government. We want clear leadership, and unfortunately the DAF has refused to give that already. Rather than threatening Forwards, like the FKP-aligned pretender-to-the-throne does, we want to treat Forwards with brevity and respect.

Louisa Untermann
Leader of Pragmatiker

Date20:21:11, August 23, 2017 CET
FromVorwärts Republik!
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

With the greatest respect, I am truly greatful for your praise of our party and my family, however switching the cabinet in such a manner would cause huge instability, and as Progress have rightly pointed out we are the smallest grouping in the chamber. I can't vote for this, nor really can we vote against, therefore we will abstain. I would advice the president, if I may, that of this will become such an issue, fresh elections are as many are aware always a possibility.

Kristian von Traisheim,
Leader of Forwards!
Head of the Traisheim Dynasty

Date20:39:28, August 23, 2017 CET
FromGrüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

I would ask Forwards to reconsider, for Dorvik's sake. We are more than happy to discuss with them policies they want to see. I think the current cabinet is already unstable. They are attacking each other and failing to deliver. Dorvish people deserve better. Forwards should know that, as a respectable party.

Louisa Untermann
Leader of Pragmatiker

Date21:05:36, August 23, 2017 CET
FromHosian-Konservative Allianz
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessageHerr President,

It appears that the Pragmatic should rebrand yet again to Panderers, as that is all they are doing.


Date21:11:04, August 23, 2017 CET
FromGrüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

That comment should show to Forwards that the FKP simply isn't governing well and they would be better at having the Chancellorship. It's sad they can't be more mature.

Louisa Untermann
Leader of Pragmatiker

Date21:51:18, August 23, 2017 CET
FromDorvische Allianz für Freiheit
ToDebating the President's Cabinet Proposal of April 4261
MessagePresident,

It is ridiculous to switch out a perfectly fine coalition with one that lacks internal party support. The lengths to which the Pragmatiker go in order to keep their power is amazing.

Hugo Landa
Staatskanzler

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 257

no
   

Total Seats: 269

abstain
   

Total Seats: 73


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a cheque. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Martin Luther King Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64