We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 2189
Details
Submitted by[?]: LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2190
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Partisans And Artisans League
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Partisans And Artisans League
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Partisans And Artisans League
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Moderate Beluzians
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Moderate Beluzians
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the National Conservative Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the National Conservative Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Moderate Beluzians
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:02:23, February 22, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2189 |
| Message | I'd vote for this over the own presented by the Conservatives. Though...I would loose two positions, so maybe not. |
| Date | 08:00:24, February 22, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2189 |
| Message | The conservitive cabinet passed: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewcabinet.php?nationid=9 So you would go from no seats to two seats. |
| Date | 08:15:02, February 22, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2189 |
| Message | This is unconstitutional, and I motion it be removed. Only the President may present a cabinet, and this was presented AFTER the last election. |
| Date | 05:59:08, February 23, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2189 |
| Message | With the constant early election results and cabinet proposals, I think it's unfair to claim foul with anyone. I myself will enjoy this experence much better when the constant changes stop. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 48 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 48 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 4 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson |