We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Wildlife Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: 进步党 (Progress Party) 🐲
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4277
Description[?]:
So long as these creatures walk on the same earth and breathe the same air as us, they deserve to be treated fairly. No species is superior to another. Dai An Environment and Tourism Critic |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to kill animals.
Old value:: Killing animals is legal but regulated.
Current: Killing animals is illegal.
Proposed: Killing animals is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Proposed: Keeping exotic animals is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:22:05, September 24, 2017 CET | From | 國民黨 (Nationalist Party) | To | Debating the Wildlife Act |
Message | The government is happy to support this legislation. Feng Xinyue Chancellor of Indrala |
Date | 17:57:35, September 24, 2017 CET | From | 莲花党 (Lotus Party) 🌸 | To | Debating the Wildlife Act |
Message | The Lotus Party will vote for this legislation. Huang Zitao Leader of the Lotus Party |
Date | 21:43:09, September 24, 2017 CET | From | 进步党 (Progress Party) 🐲 | To | Debating the Wildlife Act |
Message | The Republicans applaud both the government and the opposition for supporting this bill. Perhaps our people would respect lawmakers if we could work across party lines more. Dai An Environment and Tourism Critic |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 668 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Benefits should be conferred gradually; and in that way they will taste better." - Niccolo Machiavelli |